View/Download PDF
CROSSMARK LOGO Buy Reprints
PDF

Translate this page into:

Letters to Editor
19 (
2
); 126-127
doi:
10.4103/0973-1075.116705

Evidence-based Practice in Chronic Pain: A Multidimensional Biopsychosocial Paradigm is the “Need of the Hour” in Palliative Care

Department of Physiotherapy, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
Department of Orthopaedics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
Address for correspondence: Assoc. Prof. Senthil Paramasivam Kumar; E-mail: senthil.kumar@manipal.edu
Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher; therefore Scientific Scholar has no control over the quality or content of this article.

Sir,

I read with interest and enthusiasm the article on evidence-based practice of chronic pain and I wish to congratulate Garg et al.[1] on their breakthrough initiative to enlighten the clinical and scientific palliative care settings with the re-emerging evidence-based practice paradigm, which is the need for the hour in developing countries.

I wish to add a few points on the article;

The paper was titled so, but I could find little or no information on non-pharmacological interventions for management of chronic pain in terms of established high-level evidence. Recently, published systematic reviews and meta-analyses unanimously recommend physical activity for prevention and/or management of both cancer[2] and non-cancer chronic pain for patients of all ages around the globe.[3]

Physical therapy treatment options for chronic pain included the use of physical modalities, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, manual physical therapy and exercise therapy, which not only enable symptom control, but also enhance quality-of-life.[4] The updated evidence of efficacy currently exists for virtual reality,[5] graded motor imagery[6] and activity pacing prescriptions.[78]

Recent understanding of chronic pain had shifted from a biomedical dimension to a behavioral dimension[9] leading to a biopsychosocial approach[10] to evaluation and management of chronic pain.

Interdisciplinary programs involve the use of multiple disciplines such as physical and occupational therapy, pain psychology, medical pain management, vocational rehabilitation, relaxation training and nursing educations.[11] Such an interdisciplinary rehabilitation approach was shown to be effective in management of people with chronic pain.[12]

Physical activity as a part of an individualized exercise prescription provides a safe, cost-free, non-pharmacologic way of managing pain has been found to reduce anxiety and depression, improve physical capacity, increase functioning and independence and reduce morbidity and mortality.[13] Such a prescription when combined with the cognitive-behavioral therapy as a multi-component approach had garnered good evidence of effectiveness as stand-alone, adjunctive treatments for patients with chronic pain.[14]

The biopsychosocial disease consequence model describes the rehabilitation process of patients with chronic pain as a three-axial (biopsychosocial) and 3D (disease consequences) assessment and intervention grid for functioning,[15] which is yet to be explored in evidence-based practice for chronic pain.

REFERENCES

  1. , , , , . Evidence based practice of chronic pain. Indian J Palliat Care. 2012;18:155-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Physical activity in patients with advanced-stage cancer: A systematic review of the literature. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2012;16:293-300.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: Lessons from around the world. Lancet. 2012;380:272-81.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Physical therapy in palliative care: From symptom control to quality of life: A critical review. Indian J Palliat Care. 2010;16:138-46.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Scientific evidence for the effectiveness of virtual reality for pain reduction in adults with acute or chronic pain. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;144:40-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . The effects of graded motor imagery and its components on chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain. 2013;14:3-13.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Activity pacing, avoidance, endurance, and associations with patient functioning in chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:2109-2121.e7.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . Review of occupational therapy for people with chronic pain. Aust Occup Ther J. 2011;58:74-81.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Attitudes and beliefs about chronic pain among nurses-biomedical or behavioral? A cross-sectional survey. Indian J Palliat Care. 2011;17:227-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . Biopsychosocial approaches to the treatment of chronic pain. Clin J Pain. 2001;17:S114-27.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Focused review of interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs for chronic pain management. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012;16:147-52.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . The effects of interdisciplinary team assessment and a rehabilitation program for patients with chronic pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92:77-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . The role of exercise and types of exercise in the rehabilitation of chronic pain: Specific or nonspecific benefits. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012;16:153-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . Non-pharmacological treatment of chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2011;25:299-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . The biopsychosocial disease consequence model in rehabilitation: Model development in the Finnish ‘work hardening’ programme for chronic pain. Int J Rehabil Res. 1996;19:93-109.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    71

    PDF downloads
    0
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections