Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Conference Abstract
Conference Editorial
Conference Proceedings
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
General Medicine, Case Report
IAPCONKochi 2019 Conference Proceedings
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Narrative Review
Original Article
Palliative Medicine, Letter to the Editor
Personal Reflection
Perspective
Perspectives
Position Paper
Position Statement
Practitioner Section
Report
REPUBLICATION: Special Article (Guidelines)
Review Article
Short Communication
Special Editorial
Special Review
Systematic Review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
26 (
4
); 479-489
doi:
10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_227_19

A Descriptive Study to Assess the Knowledge, Attitude, Practices, Perceived Barriers, and Support Regarding Palliative Care and End-of-Life Care among Critical Care Nurses of Tertiary Care Medical Institute

Address for correspondence: Dr. Rakesh Garg, Room No. 139, Fist Floor, Department of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, Dr. BRAIRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi - 110 029, India. E-mail: drrgarg@hotmail.com
Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher; therefore Scientific Scholar has no control over the quality or content of this article.

Abstract

Introduction:

The role of nurses working in critical care setup is one of the key members for optimal provision of the palliative care and end-of-life care (EOLC). This study aims to assess knowledge, attitude, practices, and perceived barriers regarding palliative and EOLC among critical care nurses.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 386 critical care nurses of a tertiary care center, selected through convenience sampling technique. Data related to knowledge, attitude, practices, and perceived barriers were collected using a standardized tool. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 24.

Results:

We observed that mean knowledge, attitude, and practice scores of critical care nurses were 9.83 ± 2.50 of 20, 104.91 ± 13.04 of 150, and 17.61 ± 4.36 of 27, respectively. One of the major barriers in providing palliative and EOLC was being called for attending to other newly admitted patients. The mean knowledge score of nurses was found to be significantly higher among female nurses (P = 0.016). Nurses who had additional training pertaining to palliative and EOLC had significantly higher mean knowledge (P = 0.001) and attitude scores (P = 0.02) than those who did not have such training. The mean practice (P = 0.02) and attitude score (P = 0.002) was significantly higher among postgraduate nurses as compared to nurses with lower qualification. The mean attitude score was significantly higher among nurses of lower age group (P = 0.04) along with a negative correlation of age of nurses with attitude (P = 0.01). Nurses' practice was positively correlated to the attitude (P = 0.001) and knowledge (P = 0.01).

Conclusion:

There is a considerable gap between critical care nurses' knowledge and practices, in spite of having a good attitude regarding palliative and EOLC. This necessitates the strengthening of both preservice and in-service education for nurses.

Keywords

Attitude
barriers
critical care nurses
end-of-life care
knowledge
palliative care
practices

INTRODUCTION

According to the World Health Organization, “Palliative care is an approach that improves the quality of life of patients and their families facing the problems associated with life-threatening illness, through prevention and relief of suffering by means of early identification and impeccable assessment and treatment of pain and other problems; physical, psychosocial and spiritual.”[1] End-of-life care (EOLC) may be defined as “the active, total care of patients who are unresponsive to curative treatment.”[2] There is a working culture among health-care workers due to which center of interest is on cure and purposefully or accidentally, the vast majority of them maintain a distance from the dying patient.[3] The role of nurses in the provision of palliative and EOLC is determined by their interest, willingness, attitude, and rapport with the patient and family members.[4]

The role of critical care nurses in overall management of critically ill patients is paramount and irrefutable. The involvement of nurses in critical decision-making along with adequate training in palliative and EOLC needs to be emphasized.[4567] However, there are not sufficient data from critical care nursing personnel with regard to the understanding of palliative and EOLC.

The objectives of the study were to assess the knowledge, attitude, practice, perceived barriers, and support regarding palliative and EOLC among critical care nurses. This will be helpful in understanding a portion of the sufficiency as well as deficiencies among critical care nurses in regard to various aspects of palliative and EOLC. The secondary objective of this study was to determine the association of knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding palliative and EOLC with the selected variables.

METHODS

This descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out at critical care units of a tertiary care teaching Institute after institutional ethical committee approval vide Ref. No. IECPG-43/28.02.18. The critical care nurses, who were registered nurses and working in critical care units for at least 1 year, were enrolled for the study and written informed consent was obtained to participate in the study.

Data collection tools

Data related to demography and study parameters were assessed and recorded using the following tools [Appendix]:

Tool I

It consisted of demographic datasheet.

Tool II

Self-administered knowledge assessment questionnaire: It was developed by the researcher based on a review of the literature and validated by experts for its content, face, construct, and criteria (r = 0.88). It included 20 multiple choice questions with four options each. The areas covered were philosophy and meaning of palliative and EOLC, patient assessment, management of airway, breathing, pain, constipation, delirium, oral health, death, and loss. Each question was scored, as 1 score will be given for correct answer and 0 score for incorrect/unanswered answer. Knowledge was categorized as per the review of literature as poor <10 scores (<50% of total score), satisfactory 10–13 scores (50%–65% of total score), good 14–17 scores (66%–85% of total score), and excellent >17 scores (>85% of total score).[12367]

Tool III

Frommelt Attitude toward Care of the Dying[8] Scale for attitude is 30-item standardized tool with 5-point Likert scale to indicate respondents' attitudes toward caring for dying patients. It includes 15 positively and 15 negatively worded statements with response options: strongly disagree (1), disagree (2), uncertain (3), agree (4), and strongly agree (5). Possible scores ranged from 30 to 150. Attitude scores were categorized, as per the review of literature, as favorable ≥90 scores (>60% of total score) and unfavorable <90 scores (≤60% of total score).[12367]

Tool IV

Self-reported practice checklist: It was developed by the researcher based on a review of the literature and validated by experts for its content, face, construct, and criteria (r = 0.94). It included 10 items with subitems (with a total of 27 items) and scored as 0 for no and 1 for yes. Maximum scores were 27. The practice was categorized by the researcher as per the review of literature, as satisfactory >20 marks (>75% of total score) and poor ≤20 marks (≤75% of total score).[12367]

Tool V

It consisted of self-administered scale for perceived barriers and open-ended questionnaire for perceived support.[2] This is a 3-point Likert scale with response options: not at all, some extent, and large extent. It contained four main items – environmental factor, family related factors, knowledge and skill, and treatment policy with subitems. Two open-ended (optional) questions were to measure perceived support for critical care nurses [Appendix].

The various data shall be summarized and correlation shall be statistically sought for various demographic parameters and study parameters with regard to attitude knowledge and practice.

Statistical analysis

The sample size was calculated based on data obtained from a pilot study among 40 nurses. Based on the estimated prevalence of knowledge as 50%, with margin of error as 5% and confidence interval 95%, 386 critical care nurses were enrolled for the study. Collected data were coded and entered into Microsoft Excel 2010 spreadsheet and checked for errors. SPSS (IBM Corp. Released 2016. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) was used for descriptive and inferential statistical analysis (independent t-test [for two groups, i.e., gender, marital status, and additional qualification pertaining to palliative care and EOLC] and ANOVA [for more than two groups, i.e., age, qualification, and experience in critical care units and working critical care units]) to find frequencies, percentage, and mean of variables under the study. The level of significance was set up as P ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

Of 400 nurses, 386 critical care nurses were recruited for the study and were analyzed for the outcome parameters, as the rest did not meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria [Figure 1].

Figure 1: Flow diagram of data collection procedure

The demographic profile revealed that majority nurses were females, married, graduates, and >2 years of experience in critical care units [Table 1].

Table 1: Demographic profile (n=386)
Demographic variables n (%)
Age (years)
 21-30 179 (46.4)
 31-40 200 (51.8)
 >40 7 (1.8)
Gender
 Male 172 (44.6)
 Female 214 (55.4)
Qualification
 General nursing and midwifery 95 (24.6)
 Postbasic nursing 70 (18.1)
 BSc Nursing 201 (52.1)
 MSc Nursing 20 (5.2)
Marital status
 Unmarried 77 (19.9)
 Married 309 (80.1)
Experience in critical care unit (months)
 12-24 79 (20.5)
 25-36 66 (17.1)
 37-48 21 (5.4)
 >48 220 (57)
Additional training in palliative care
 Yes 224 (58)
 No 162 (42)
Type of critical care unit
 Medical and surgical 101 (26.2)
 Cardiology and cardiothoracic 200 (51.8)
 Neurology and neurosurgical 85 (22)

Knowledge, attitude, and practice scores regarding palliative and end-of-life care (n = 386)

The mean knowledge score was 9.83 ± 2.50 where 51.6% of the nurses had satisfactory knowledge, 41.4% had poor knowledge, and 7% had good knowledge regarding palliative and EOLC. The mean attitude score of nurses was 104.91 ± 13.04 where 88.1% of the nurses had a favorable attitude and 11.9% of the nurses had an unfavorable attitude toward palliative and EOLC. The mean practice score of nurses was 17.61 ± 4.36, with 63.5% of the nurses having poor practices, whereas only 36.5% of the nurses had satisfactory practices regarding palliative and EOLC.

Table 2 shows that various perceived barriers were reported by critical nurses. Out of that, minimal (4.9%) number of nurses reported that workload is not a barrier in providing palliative and EOLC. Family members do not accept patient's poor prognosis (88.6%), difference in physician's opinion about treatment (84.7%), nurses being continually called for information (83.6%), and family members do not understand the meaning of lifesaving (82.6%) are some of the barriers reported by critical care nurses [Tables 2 and 3].

Table 2: Perceived barriers regarding palliative and end-of-life care (n=386)
Items Perceived as a barrier
Not at all, n (%) To some extent, n (%) To a large extent, n (%)
Environmental factors
 Nurses workload 19 (4.9) 188 (48.7) 179 (46.4)
 Lack of privacy in critical care unit design 112 (29) 212 (54.9) 62 (16.1)
 Liberal visiting hours 110 (28.5) 205 (53.1) 71 (18.4)
 Restrictive visiting hours 174 (45.1) 154 (39.9) 58 (15)
 Lack of available resources 91 (23.6) 190 (49.2) 105 (27.2)
Family members
 Not understanding meaning of lifesaving 67 (17.4) 239 (61.9) 80 (20.7)
 Continually calling for information 63 (16.3) 226 (58.5) 97 (25.1)
 Fighting about life support use 86 (22.3) 235 (60.9) 65 (16.8)
 Not accepting patient poor prognosis 44 (11.4) 223 (57.8) 119 (30.8)
 Not present when patient dies 105 (27.2) 160 (41.5) 121 (31.3)
Nurses knowledge and skills
 Lack of nursing education and training 115 (29.8) 172 (44.6) 99 (25.6)
 Not knowing patients’ wishes 121 (31.3) 182 (47.2) 83 (21.5)
Treatment policy
 Not considering nurses’ opinion 102 (26.4) 191 (49.5) 93 (24.1)
 Being called to help with newly admitting patients 79 (20.5) 238 (61.7) 69 (17.9)
 Difference in physicians’ opinion about treatment 59 (15.3) 217 (56.2) 110 (28.5)
Table 3: Perceived support regarding palliative and endof- life care among critical care nurses
Nurse (n=1): There should be adequate infusion pump at least (4 per patient) in an ICU with proper functioning ventilators and bedside monitors
Nurse (n=2): Provision of free or subsidized accommodation and provision of food for patient’s close members (for at least 1 or 2) if patient stays at hospital or healthcare setting
Nurse (n=3): Nurses should also be involved in discussions during doctors rounds
Nurses (n=266): There should be in-service training for critical care nurses regarding palliative and EOLC
Nurses (n=299): There should be good communication among doctors and nurses so that care can be provided effectively
Nurses (n=320): Palliative and EOLC should be provided by the same nurse to maintain continuity of care
Nurses (n=316): Family members should be involved in patient’s palliative and EOLC

EOLC: End-of-life care, ICU: Intensive care unit

The association among the studied parameters was analyzed [Table 4]. It revealed that the younger age group had a statistically higher mean attitude score. Female nurses had more mean knowledge score than the male nurses. The mean knowledge as well as the practice score of nurses who had additional training was statistically higher than those who had not additional training. Postgraduate nurses had statistically higher practice as well as attitude mean scores than other lower qualification group. Nurses working in neurology/neurosurgical critical care units had statistically higher mean attitude score.

Table 4: Association of knowledge, attitude, and practice scores of critical care nurses regarding palliative and end-oflife care with their selected sociodemographic variables (n=386)
Demographic variables Frequency (n) Mean±SD
Knowledge score Attitude score Practice score
Age (years)
 21-30 179 17.45±3.85 106.47±14.64 9.97±2.32
 31-40 200 17.76±4.78 103.79±10.65 9.72±2.63
 >40 7 17.71±4.57 97.14±24.70 9.57±3.25
P 0.61 0.04 0.78
Gender
 Male 172 17.63±4.33 105.83±13.44 9.49±2.54
 Female 214 17.60±4.40 104.18±12.70 10.11±2.44
P 0.02 0.22 0.95
Marital status
 Married 309 17.7 ±4.13 104.63±12.85 9.85±2.58
 Unmarried 77 17.17±5.21 106.06±13.83 9.74±2.15
P 0.69 0.41 0.39
Additional training of palliative care
 Yes 224 17.78±4.56 106.36±10.68 10.37±2.29
 No 162 17.38±4.08 102.92±15.56 9.09±2.58
P 0.001 0.02 0.37
Qualification
 General nursing and midwifery 95 17.44±4.05 101.55±12.19 9.80±2.55
 Postbasic nursing 70 17.61±3.81 102.66±11.92 9.51±2.83
 BSc nursing 201 17.40±4.66 106.91±13.72 9.91±2.29
 MSc nursing 20 20.55±3.64 108.80±9.07 10.35±3.08
P 0.54 0.002 0.02
Experience in critical care unit (months)
 12-24 79 18.08±4.44 104.84±13.74 9.81±2.53
 25-36 66 17.06±3.74 109.06±15.73 9.91±2.30
 37-48 21 16.29±4.06 106.43±8.99 9.00±2.32
 >49 220 17.74±4.52 103.55±11.99 9.90±2.56
P 0.47 0.03 0.25
Critical care units
 Medical/surgical 101 17.65±4.00 101.8±17.07 9.38±2.65
 Cardiology/cardiovascular surgery 200 17.76±4.53 105.58±10.47 10.02±0.48
 Neurology/neurosurgical 85 17.24±4.40 106.98±12.51 9.93±2.32
P 0.10 0.02 0.65

The correlation of the age of nurses with their attitude, knowledge, and practice was −0.13, −0.05, and 0.03, respectively (P = 0.01, 0.32, and 0.50, respectively). There was a significant negative correlation of age of nurses to their attitude regarding palliative and EOLC. The correlation of the practice of critical care nurses with their knowledge and attitude was 0.14 and 0.34, respectively (P = 0.01 and 0.001, respectively). The practice of critical care nurses is significantly correlated to the knowledge and attitude of critical care nurses regarding palliative and EOLC.

DISCUSSION

We observed from our study that 41.4% of the nurses had a poor knowledge with regard to palliative care and EOLC with many perceived barriers. Furthermore, the knowledge score of female nurses regarding palliative and EOLC is significantly higher than male nurses. In the present study, a significantly higher knowledge and attitude score was found among nurses who had additional training regarding palliative and EOLC.

Similar findings have been reported by other studies as well.[910] The new findings from our study revealed that there is an utter need of higher structured training for nurses that would not only increase knowledge but also change attitude and practice pattern with regard to palliative care and EOLC. Not only higher education but also additional training like in-service training program for nurses would be helpful for better provision of palliative care and EOLC. Hence, higher education among nurses needs to be encouraged and supported. Nurses need to be timely motivated and reinforced to maintain the continuity of best care.

It appears that neurological/neurosurgical critical care units had more chronic debilitated patient in views of nature of diseases, so the understanding of palliative and EOLC appears to be better among critical care nurses in these specialties. An appropriate protocol may be developed and made available to nursing staff based on findings of the current study, and the outcome from these may be translated across all types of critical care units.

In the present study, one of the most reported perceived barriers by critical care nurse was their workload (95.1%), which is comparable to the study findings of Attia et al.[2] where all the nurses (100%) reported workload as a barrier in providing palliative and EOLC. This needs a policy consideration to include palliative care nurses as a part of routine care for patients with chronic diseases, and the nurses should be involved in treatment planning as well. New nursing post can be created as nurse counselor, palliative nurse, etc. Other barriers reported by nurses included the absence of understanding lifesaving terminology (82.6%) and denial for acceptance of poor prognosis among family members (88.6%). This indicates the need of counseling for family members and involvement of nurses as well. Majority of nurses reported that availability of good communication between health-care team (77%), provision of in-service training for nurses (68%), and involvement of family members in patient's care (81%) could support them in rendering effective palliative and EOLC.

The strength of the study lies in the adequacy of sample size, selecting the participants from the critical care units with different specialties and using a standardized tool for assessing the attitude of critical care nurses toward palliative and EOLC.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the role of nurses for the provision of palliative and EOLC in critically ill patients is paramount. However, there appears to be a significant gap between knowledge and practices of critical care nurses related to palliative and EOLC. The barriers perceived by critical care nurses need to be addressed with administrative and clinical policies for optimal delivery palliative and EOLC. The appropriate training, policy change, and involvement of nurses in treatment planning would help in avoiding many of the barriers in the provision of effective palliative and EOLC.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. , , . Knowledge and practice of staff nurses on palliative care. IJHRMLP. 2015;1:41-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Critical care nurses' perception of barriers and supportive behaviors in end-of-life care. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2013;30:297-304.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Assessment of palliative care awareness among undergraduate healthcare students. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:JC06-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . The nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards the palliative care. J Educ Pract. 2015;6:91-100.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , . The current status of palliative care in India. Cancer Manag. 2015;1:57-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Critical care nurses' knowledge, practice, obstacles and helpful measures towards palliative care for critically Ill patients. AJNS. 2017;6:293-303.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Palliative care awareness among Indian undergraduate health care students: A needs-assessment study to determine incorporation of palliative care education in undergraduate medical, nursing and allied health education. Indian J Palliat Care. 2010;16:154-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . Refining the frommelt attitude toward the care of the dying scale (FATCOD-B) for medical students: A confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch validation study. Palliative Supportive Care. 2018;16:50-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . Assessment of nurses' knowledge, attitude, practice and associated factors towards palliative care: In the case of Amhara region hospitals. Adv Biol Res. 2016;10:110-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , . Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice and associated factors towards palliative care among nurses working in selected hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Palliat Care. 2014;13:1-11.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections