Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Addendum
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Conference Abstract
Conference Editorial
Conference Proceedings
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
General Medicine Original Article
General Medicine, Case Report
General Medicine, Review Article
IAPCONKochi 2019 Conference Proceedings
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Notice of Retraction
Oral Abstracts
Original Article
Palliative Medicine Commentary
Palliative Medicine, Letter to Editor
Palliative Medicine, Letter to the Editor
Palliative Medicine, Original Article
Palliative Medicine, Review Article
Personal Reflection
Perspective
Perspectives
Position Paper
Position Statement
Poster Abstracts
Practitioner Section
Report
REPUBLICATION: Special Article (Guidelines)
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers 2023
Short Communication
Short Report
Special Editorial
Special Review
Systematic Review
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Addendum
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Conference Abstract
Conference Editorial
Conference Proceedings
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
General Medicine Original Article
General Medicine, Case Report
General Medicine, Review Article
IAPCONKochi 2019 Conference Proceedings
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Notice of Retraction
Oral Abstracts
Original Article
Palliative Medicine Commentary
Palliative Medicine, Letter to Editor
Palliative Medicine, Letter to the Editor
Palliative Medicine, Original Article
Palliative Medicine, Review Article
Personal Reflection
Perspective
Perspectives
Position Paper
Position Statement
Poster Abstracts
Practitioner Section
Report
REPUBLICATION: Special Article (Guidelines)
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers 2023
Short Communication
Short Report
Special Editorial
Special Review
Systematic Review
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Addendum
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Conference Abstract
Conference Editorial
Conference Proceedings
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
General Medicine Original Article
General Medicine, Case Report
General Medicine, Review Article
IAPCONKochi 2019 Conference Proceedings
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Notice of Retraction
Oral Abstracts
Original Article
Palliative Medicine Commentary
Palliative Medicine, Letter to Editor
Palliative Medicine, Letter to the Editor
Palliative Medicine, Original Article
Palliative Medicine, Review Article
Personal Reflection
Perspective
Perspectives
Position Paper
Position Statement
Poster Abstracts
Practitioner Section
Report
REPUBLICATION: Special Article (Guidelines)
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers 2023
Short Communication
Short Report
Special Editorial
Special Review
Systematic Review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Commentary
25 (
1
); 91-92
doi:
10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_204_18

Commentary

Department of Mental Health Education, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Address for correspondence: Prof. Santosh K Chaturvedi, Department of Mental Health Education, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru - 560 029, Karnataka, India. E-mail: skchatur@yahoo.com

Read COMMENTARY-ARTICLE associated with this -

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Palliative care is traditionally associated with care of persons with advanced cancer and those who are terminally ill. Gradually, the philosophy of palliation has been extended to other incurable diseases, such as neurological disorders, pulmonary and cardiac diseases, kidney and other organ failures. Lately, palliative care for chronic and incurable neurological diseases has become popular, especially for dementias and other chronic and progressive degenerative diseases. In context of these positive developments, it is heartening to see a qualitative study on palliative needs of stroke patients in this issue of the journal.[1] As mentioned in this article, stroke is one of the important noncommunicable diseases leading to great morbidity and mortality. Most stroke patients suffer due to multiple symptoms and disability. Clinical neurologists focus either on prevention of future stroke or on planning rehabilitative physiotherapy and other interventions to reduce disability. Although stroke patients also report of different types of pain symptoms, one does not pay much attention to these.

The study by Lloyd et al.[1] has identified eight palliation-related themes in their qualitative study. Physical burden in the form of pain due to different factors is an important one. Psychological needs are also significant. Poststroke depression is commonly seen in clinical practice but does not get its due attention as this is considered as a natural reaction to the functional disability due to stroke. This reminds us of a similar situation of depression in advanced cancer which is considered to be a natural reaction to disease. Like in palliative care for cancer, communication skills are of paramount importance. Patients and their caregivers have similar questions about-why me?, what will happen in future?, and risk of further vascular attacks. In stroke patients, communication with the patient becomes a bigger challenge due to aphasia and inability to consent due to lack of capacity.

Stroke patients also have social and psychological issues similar to those in patients with advanced cancer. Spiritual distrust and distress is also reported in this study in the form of existential distress and spiritual struggle.[1] This emphasizes the role of psychosocial and spiritual care for stroke patients.

Two other important dimensions of palliative care in stroke patients need a mention. First is end-of-life care; like in palliative care for advanced cancer, end-of-life issues are important in stroke. Stroke is more unpredictable and sudden as compared to advanced cancer. This makes the end-of-life care even more challenging. Patients and family members are likely to raise questions about these end-of-life care issues frequently. The second dimension is on quality of life. Like improving quality of life is a major goal for palliative care in cancer, the same applies for stroke. There are standardized scales for assessment of quality of life in stroke patients. All efforts need to be made to improve the quality of life of stroke patients.

Other related issues are addressing caregiver burden faced by relatives or caregivers of the stroke patient. This might include individual or group counseling and psychosocial support. The chronicity of disability due to stroke can lead to stress and burnout among the caregivers. Shared decision-making and individualized care is advisable. Staff must be supported and trained in talking openly and honestly about the possibility of death or survival with severe disability, particularly in the acute setting, where the majority of deaths occur.

Some professionals may view the term “palliative care” as something negative, applicable only to someone who was clearly dying, as a recent study noted.[2] Barriers to its use included prognostic uncertainty, although one physician understood that this may remain, even after introducing a palliative approach. Professionals spoke about the need for everyone involved in patient care to have the time and ability to communicate effectively, with referrals being made to specialist palliative care only when required.[2]

In our country, where palliative care is only 25 years old, spreading its role to other life-threatening diseases may take time. However, there is no doubt that palliative care for stroke patients is also equally important. Two approaches can be suggested. First, if there is a palliative care unit or center, stroke patients can be referred for palliative care services. The second approach may be that the doctors and nurses in the stroke unit themselves get trained and skilled in providing palliative care services to their stroke patients. More research in this area will also throw light on the approaches which can be applied in stroke patients in our country. Palliative care could provide additional support to improve outcomes of stroke patients and their families.

REFERENCES

  1. , , , , . A qualitative study on palliative needs of stroke patients in an Indian tertiary care setting - doctors’ perspective. Indian J Palliat Care. 2019;25:84-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Outcomes, experiences and palliative care in major stroke: A multicentre, mixed-method, longitudinal study. CMAJ. 2018;190:E238-46.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    994

    PDF downloads
    853
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections