Translate this page into:
The Effect of Complementary and Alternative Medicines on Quality of Life in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
Address for correspondence: Mrs. Fatemeh Bakhshi, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: f_bakhshi@razi.tums.ac.ir
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
Background:
Breast cancer disease and its classic treatment lead to decrease in patients' quality of life (QOL). This systematic review aimed to compare the effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) categories on the QOL of women with breast cancer.
Methods:
English clinical trials from PubMed, Emabase, Scupos, and Google Scholar databases were searched electronically by the end of 2018 with the Cochrane Collaboration protocol. Two researchers independently extracted data such as participants' characteristics, CAM methods, QOL assessment tools. CAMs were classified into three categories of dietary supplements, herbal medicine, and mind-body techniques.
Results:
During the initial search, 1186 articles were found. After reviewing titles, abstracts, and full texts based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 28 clinical trials were included in the systematic review, 18 of which was randomized controlled trial (RCT). Participants included women with breast cancer who were undergoing the first three phases of breast cancer or postcancer rehabilitation. Among CAM interventions, one article used a dietary supplement, and the other 27 articles included a variety of mind-body techniques. Twenty-seven studies showed improved QOL (P > 0.05).
Conclusion:
The findings may indicate the potential benefits of CAMs, especially mind-body techniques on QOL in breast cancer patients. Further RCTs or long-term follow-up studies are recommended. Moreover, the use of similar QOL assessment tools allows for more meta-analysis and generalizability of results, especially for the development of clinical guidelines.
Keywords
Breast cancer
complementary therapies
quality of life
systematic review
INTRODUCTION
The increasing prevalence of cancer in recent years and its effects on various physical-psychological and social aspects of human life have made it as a major health problem.[1] Among all types of cancer, breast cancer is one of the most common and the most important health problem in the world.[2] The prevalence and incidence of the disease have been increasing over the past 25 years, especially in developing countries.[3] Despite high mortality rates of breast cancer, the survival rate has also been increased.[4] However, these patients are exposed to numerous physiological and psychological stressors that affect their quality of life (QOL).[5]
Although classic treatments for breast cancer, such as surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy, have beneficial medical consequences, they also result in side effects.[6] Most of patients suffer from the disease and the side effects of classical treatments, such as fatigue, anxiety, depression, nausea, pain, and a high risk of developing a secondary tumor.[7] Many patients have reported feelings of abandonment and isolation following the end of their active treatment, which exacerbates symptoms such as depression and anxiety. These feelings and conditions affect their QOL. Hence, the QOL in these patients has been reported lower than other cancer patients.[8]
In recent years, the study of QOL as an important issue in health care has been considered, especially in breast cancer.[9] According to the WHO definition, QOL is a subjective concept influenced by psychological, cultural, and social factors. Self-assessment is an important factor in evaluating QOL.[10] Taking actions to control the complications of breast cancer and improving the QOL of patients is strongly recommended.[11] In this regard, interventions have been introduced which encompass a wide range of psychosocial, behavioral, and environmental strategies. Mostly, these interventions aimed to complement the classic treatment for enhancing the QOL.[12] Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) as one of these interventions has been welcomed by many breast cancer patients and survivors.[13]
According to the National Center for CAM, CAM is defined as a group of diverse medical and health systems, functions, and products that are not generally part of classical medicine.[14] Complementary therapies are used in combination with classical medicine, while alternative therapies work instead of classical medicine.[15] Studies also classify CAM into three categories of dietary supplements, herbal medicines, and mind and body techniques:[16]
-
Dietary supplements: Such as alpha-factor, high-dose Vitamin C, selenium, carnitine, vitamins, enzyme therapy, dietary advice
-
Herbal medicines: Such as mistletoe therapy, Chinese herbal medicine
-
Mind-body Techniques: Such as acupuncture, hyperthermia, movement therapy (qigong), laser therapy, orthomolecular therapy, osteopathy, phototherapy, healing touch, homeopathy, lymphatic drainage, magnet field therapy, manual therapy, neural therapy, Shiatsu.
The main causes of the tendency for CAM have been reported as the possibility for enhancing QOL, physical and mental recovery, strengthening the immune system, and reducing the side effects of classical medicine.[1718] However, some studies have shown that patients with breast cancer who use CAM have higher rates of mental disorders and lower QOL.[19] Although a number of systematic reviews have been made in this area, their emphasis has been only on a specific category of CAM.[2021] Some have focused on Chinese medicine,[722] or have included all cancer patients.[23] Thus, there is a knowledge gap about which of CAM categories has more influence on breast cancer patients' QOL. In addition, new clinical trials are conducting in this field, regardless of the results of previous interventions and their effectiveness. Therefore, CAM interventions have not been presented as clinical guidelines for widespread use in breast cancer patients. Results of a systematic review can be useful to compare the effects of three categories of dietary supplements, herbal medicines, and mind and body techniques. Such a systematic review will allow the development of a clinical guideline for use in these patients. In this systematic review, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of CAM categories on the QOL of women with breast cancer.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviewers.[24] Data were analyzed and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) using the PRISMA checklist and PRISMA methodology flowchart.[25] Search questions and strategies were determined by (F. B) and (Z. N) with the supervision of (N. D. N).
Search question, population, inclusion and exclusion criteria
The research question posed in the systematic review was as follows: How does CAM affect the QOL of women with breast cancer? The study population included women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer. There were no criteria and limitations for the method of the diagnosis and stage of breast cancer in the studies. The primary outcome of this review was the QOL assessment of women with breast cancer after receiving CAM interventions and techniques.
The main inclusion criteria were: (1) Study method as a type of clinical trial. (2) The target population should be only women with breast cancer. (3) Investigate patients' QOL as an outcome. (4) CAM methods have been used as intervention. The QOL assessment should have been performed with validated and reliable instruments. To examine all three categories of CAM methods, all of them were included in this review. Most studies in the field have also used the keywords complementary medicine, alternative medicine, and Chinese medicine. Therefore, these three keywords were included in the search protocol to identify more studies in the initial search. Exclusion criteria included not accessible English full-text articles, and receiving classical treatment (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and surgery) concurrent with CAM.
Search strategy
Searches of electronic databases were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The time limit was not considered for search to reach the maximum number of eligible articles. Studies were searched by the end of 2018. Conference proceeding abstracts were searched in the Conference Proceeding Citation Index. PICO-based keywords included “Breast Cancer,” “Breast Neoplasm,” “Complementary medicine,” “Alternative medicine,” “Chinese medicine,” “Complementary therapies,” and QOL. For example, the search strategy for PubMed based on MeSH is given in Box 1.
Study selection
After eliminating duplicates, two researchers (F. B) and (Z. N) independently assessed all the titles and abstracts of the articles found in the initial search based on inclusion criteria. In the second step, the full text of all selected articles was reviewed to ensure they were eligible for the final entry. Any disagreements between researchers (F. B) and (Z. N) were resolved by a third researcher (N. D. N). During the process of reviewing and filtering the articles, no disagreement was observed between researchers.
Data collection and assessment of potential bias
(F. B) and (A. Kh) performed data extraction and quality assessment of the articles. The following study characteristics were collected from final included full texts: First author, year, country, study design, participants, intervention group (the type of CAM) and comparison group with samples, duration of intervention, instrument and measurement time, and a summary of outcome related to QOL.
The quality and risk of bias assessment for included articles were also independently assessed by both researchers. In case of disagreement, (N. D. N) would help to solve them. For quality assessment, the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions criteria were used to estimate performance, attrition, detection, selection, and reporting biases. The risk of bias evaluation items included random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of patients and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, and selective reporting.
RESULTS
Study selection and data extraction
The results of the search strategy are summarized in Figure 1. A total of 1186 references were identified in the initial search. A total of 385 were deleted due to duplication and 801 references remained. With regard to the main inclusion criteria in the titles and abstracts, as well as English full text, 117 remained. Next, the full text of 117 articles was carefully reviewed for inclusion and exclusion criteria. During this phase, 89 articles were deleted. Finally, 28 articles were included in this systematic review. Then, the data were systematically extracted from 28 articles which are shown in Table 1.
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses flow diagram
| ID | First author, years, Country | Study design | Participants Total=Enrolled | Intervention n=Completed | Comparison n=Completed | Duration | Instrument measurement time | Summary of outcome (P) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aghamohammadi, 2017, Iran[26] | Clinical trial study | Newly diagnosed with breast cancer Total=119 | Honey and cinnamon mixture: Three times daily for 1 week n=117 |
No comparison | 1 week | EORTC QLQ-C30: One week before and 1 week after intervention | Significant effect of honey and cinnamon mixture program on QOL after intervention (<0.05) |
| 2 | Argenbright, 2016, USA[27] | A pilot clinical trial study | Breast cancer survivors with lymphedema Total=21 | Bowen work intervention: 5-10, 45 min sessions | No comparison | 6 weeks | SF-36/FACT-B: At baseline and postintervention | Significant change in mental health domain of SF-36 and total score of FACT-B, indicating of improvement in QOL of participants (<0.05) |
| 3 | Bao, 2014, USA[28] | Dual-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial | Breast cancer, receiving an adjuvant AI Total=n=59 | RA n=23 |
SA n=24 |
8 weeks | EORTC QLQ-C30: At baseline and at 4, 8 and 12 weeks | QOL significantly improved in SA group (<0.05) |
| 4 | Carlsson, 2004, Sweden[29] | Nonrandomized controlled trial | Newly diagnosed with breast cancer Total=120 | ABCW: 5-29 days n=60 |
CBCW: Regional care program for all patients n=60 |
1-4 weeks | EORTC QLQ-C30: At baseline, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year | Improvements in some subscales for QOL between baseline and different follow-up periods in ABCW group (<0.05) |
| 5 | Carlson, 2013, Canada[30] | A multi-site randomized controlled trial | Breast cancer with stage I, II, or III Total=271 | MBCR: Eight weekly group sessions of 90 min each plus a 6 h workshop n=113 or SET: 12 weekly group sessions of 90 min each n=104 |
Control group; SMS: 1 day n=54 |
1 day to 12 weeks (depends on intervention) | FACT-B: At baseline and immediately postintervention | More improvement in QOL at MBCR group compared with control group (<0.05) |
| 6 | Charlson, 2014, USA[31] | A pilot study Quasi- experimental | Stage I-III breast cancer who had completed initial treatment: 8 weekly group sessions focus on teaching meditation skills/12-session cognitive-affective- behavioral learning program Total=46 | Guided meditation and cognitive- affective-behavioral learning n=46 |
No comparison | 20 weeks | FACT-G: At baseline and immediately after intervention | Intervention had clinically significant impact on improving QOL (<0.05) |
| 7 | Cho, 2016, South Korea[32] | Randomized trial | Breast cancer patients with AWS Total=41 | PT combined with MLD 3 times/week n=21 |
MLD 5 times/week n=20 |
4 weeks | EORTC QLQ-C30: At baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment | QOL has been improved in both groups (<0.05) |
| 8 | Crane-Okada, 2012, USA[33] | Randomized controlled pilot feasibility study | Breast cancer survivors Total=39 | MMP n=20 |
Usual care n=19 |
12 weeks | QOL breast cancer questionnaire: At baseline, after intervention (12 weeks), after 18 weeks | MMP group showed improvement in QOL after intervention compared to control group (<0.05) |
| 9 | Culos-Reed, 2006, Canada[34] | A pilot randomized controlled trial study | Primary breast cancer survivors Total=38 | Yoga program: 75 min in a quiet and dimly lit yoga studio n=20 |
Usual care n=18 |
7 weeks | EORTC QLQ-C30: At baseline and immediately after the yoga program | Significant effect of yoga program on QOL after intervention (<0.05) |
| 10 | Garlick, 2011, USA[35] | A phase II randomized controlled trial | Breast cancer in stages 0-III Total=30 | PSIT: 3 h sessions over 8 weeks for a total of 24 h n=20 |
No comparison | 8 weeks | FACT-B: At baseline, postintervention, and follow-up 4 weeks after treatment | Significant improvement in QOL between pre- and post-test of PSIT has been found (<0.05) |
| 11 | Gudenkauf, 2015, USA[36] | Randomized controlled dismantling trial | Stage 0-III breast cancer Total=138 | CBT n=55 or RT n=70 |
HE control group n=58 |
5 weeks | FACT-B: At baseline and postintervention | The CBT group reported improved QOL compared to RT and HE groups (<0.05) |
| 12 | Henderson, 2012, USA[37] | RCT | Early-stage breast cancer Total=172 | MBSR: Seven weekly 2.5-3.5 h sessions MBSR n=53 |
NEP or usual n=52 Supportive care (UC) n=58 |
8 weeks | FACT-B: After interventions, at 4 months, at 12 months | Significant improvement in QOL of MBSR group versus NEP and UC groups (<0.05) |
| 13 | Koch, 2017, Germany[38] | Open-label, RCT | Nonmetastatic breast cancer Total=40 | Yoga and meditation: 90 min sessions n=21 |
Usual care: Offered the same yoga classes as the intervention group after 24 weeks n=19 |
12 weeks | FACT-B: At baseline, week 12, and week 24 | Significant improvement in QOL subscales except physical wellbeing in yoga and meditation group (<0.05) |
| 14 | Larkey, 2016, USA[39] | Double-blind, randomized controlled pilot study | Breast cancer survivors Total=101 | QG/TCE: n=42 |
SQG: n=45 |
12 weeks | SF-36: At baseline, after 12 weeks intervention, at 12 weeks postintervention | No statistical significant change between QG/TCE and SQG on breast cancer patients QOL (>0.05) |
| 15 | Levine, 2012, USA[40] | A pilot/feasibility study Quasi- experimental | Previously treated for breast cancer Total=25 | Yoga program n=25 |
No control group | 6 weeks | FACT-B: Pre- and post-intervention and after 6 months | Significant improvement was found in all categories except social well-being (<0.05) |
| 16 | Liu, 2017, China[41] | Randomized controlled trial | Primary breast cancer stage 0-IIIb Total=158 | Guolin-Qigong (two 60 min sessions per week) n=79 |
Physical stretching program (260 min sessions per week) n=79 |
24 weeks | FACT-B: At baseline, after 12 weeks, immediately after 24 weeks, and at 48 weeks follow-up visit | GLQC was more effective in terms of QOL improvements than physical stretching (<0.05) |
| 17 | Milbury, 2013, USA[42] | Randomized controlled trial | Stages I-III breast cancer Total=47 | TSM program: Two weekly meditation classes (60 min) n=18 |
Wait list control group received usual care n=24 |
6 weeks | SF-36: At baseline, the last week of the meditation program and 1 month after intervention | Meditation programs have significant improvement on mental health aspect of QOL (<0.05) There was no statistical difference on physical aspect of QOL after TSM |
| 18 | Monti, 2013, USA[43] | Randomized controlled trial | Newly diagnosed with breast cancer Total=191 | MBAT n=98 |
BCSG n=93 |
8 weeks | SF-36: At baseline, immediately postintervention, at 6 months and extended follow-up (week 36) | No significant difference between MBAT and BCSG in QOL after 36 weeks (<0.05). QOL in both groups has been improved |
| 19 | Mustian, 2004, USA[44] | A pilot study | Primary breast cancer stage 0-IIIb Total=21 | TCC: Three times a week for 60 min n=11 |
PST program: Three times a week for 60 min n=10 |
12 weeks | FACIT-F: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks | TCC group showed improvements in QOL and PST group showed decline in QOL (<0.05) |
| 20 | Nidich, 2009, USA[45] | Single-blind, randomized controlled trial | Newly diagnosed with breast cancer Total=130 | TM: 7-step course lasted 1-1.5 h n=64 |
Usual care n=66 |
18 months | FACT-B: At baseline and every 6 months during intervention | Significant improvements were found in the TM group compared with controls in overall QOL (<0.05) |
| 21 | Richardson, 1997, USA[46] | Clinical trial methodology | Primary breast cancer (excluding IV) Total=47 | Standard care with 1 h support or imagery/relaxation Support (n=16) Imagery (n=16) | Standard care n=15 |
6 weeks | FACT-B: In the week before and the week after a 6 week intervention | Imagery group participants had greater QOL than the support group participants. Both interventions improved QLO compared standard care (<0.05) |
| 22 | Speed-Andrews, 2010, Canada[47] | A pilot evaluation | Newly diagnosis of breast cancer Total=24 | Iyengar yoga program: Before and after n=24 |
No comparison | 12 weeks | SF-36/FACT-B: At baseline and postprogram | Improvements in QOL and psychosocial functioning after yoga program (<0.05) |
| 23 | Sprod, 2012, USA[48] | A pilot study | Breast cancer survivors Total=21 | TCC: Three times/week; 60 min/session n=9 |
SST: Offered 4 weeks of TCC following the 12 weeks intervention n=10 |
12 weeks | SF-36: At baseline, mid-intervention (6 weeks) and postintervention (12 weeks) | Statistical significant change between TCC and SST at postintervention on QOL of breast cancer patients |
| 24 | Vadiraja, 2009, India[49] | Randomized controlled trial | Stage II and III breast cancer Total=88 | Yoga program: 18-24 sessions lasting 60 min daily n=44 |
Brief supportive therapy: Once in 10 days n=44 |
6 weeks | EORTC QLQ-C30: At baseline, after 6 weeks | Improvements in some subscales for QOL between baseline and postintervention follow-up in yoga group (<0.05) |
| 25 | Vardar Yağlı, 2015, Turkey[50] | Randomized controlled trial | Newly diagnosed with breast cancer Total=52 | Yoga combined with aerobic exercise training: Submaximal exercise 30 min/day, 3 days/week and 1 h yoga program n=19 |
Aerobic exercise training: Submaximal exercise 30 min/day, 3 days/week n=21 |
6 weeks | EORTC QLQ-C30: At baseline and posttraining | The group with aerobic exercise and yoga showed marked improvement compared with the aerobic exercise group in fatigue perception (<0.05) |
| 26 | Walker, 2010, USA[51] | Randomized controlled trial | Stage 0-III pre- or post-menopausal breast cancer Total=50 | Acupuncture twice per week for the first 4 weeks then once for the first rest 8 weeks n=25 |
Venlafaxine 37.5 mg orally at night for 1 week, then 75 mg at night for the remaining 11 weeks n=25 |
12 weeks | Men QOL: At baseline; at the end of treatment; and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months follow-ups | Acupuncture was as effective as venlafaxine for QOL (<0.05) |
| 27 | Williams, 2002, UK[52] | Randomized controlled crossover Study | Breast cancer with unilateral - related lymphedema Total=31 | MLD 45 min session, performed Monday-Friday, over 3 weeks period n=29 |
SLD 20 min each day, over a 3 weeks period n=31 |
12 weeks (6 weeks nontreatment during interventions | EORTC QLQ-C30: At baseline, after interventions, at 3, 9, and 12 postintervention | MLD improved emotional function, dyspnea, and reduced sleep disturbance (<0.05). SLD did not result in significant changes for QOL |
| 28 | Yao, 2016, South Korea[53] | Randomized controlled trial | Newly diagnosed with breast cancer Total=30 | Combined acupuncture and moxibustion (warm acupuncture) with 3 of the needles each being topped by a 3 cm moxa stick n=15 |
Diosmin: 900 mg 3 times daily n=15 |
30 days period | EORTC QLQ-C30: At baseline, after treatment | Self-reported QOL was significantly better with warm acupuncture than with diosmin (<0.05) |
SF-36=Medical outcomes study short-form health survey, QOL: Quality of life, EORTC QLQ-C30: European organization for research in the treatment of cancer-QOL, MenQOL: The menopause specific QOL questionnaire, FACT-B: The functional assessment of cancer treatment-breast, FACT-G: The General Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale, RCT: Randomized controlled clinical trial, AI: Aromatase inhibitor, AWS: Axillary web syndrome, RA: Real acupuncture, ABCW: Anthroposophic medicine, MBCR: Mindfulness-based cancer recovery, PT: Physical therapy, MMP: Mindful movement program, PSIT: Psycho - spiritual integrative therapy, CBT: Cognitive-behavioral training, RT: Relaxation training, MBSR: Mindfulness-based stress-reduction, QG/TCE: Qigong/Tai Chi Easy, TSM: Tibetan sound meditation, MBAT: Mindfulness-based art therapy, TCC: Tai Chi Chuan, TM: Transcendental meditation program, MLD: Manual lymphatic drainage, SA: Sham acupuncture, CBCW: Conventional medicine, SMS: Stress management seminar, HE: Health education, NEP: Nutrition education program, SQG: Sham Qigong, BCSG: Breast cancer support group, PST: Psychosocial support, SST: Standard support therapy, SLD: Simple lymphatic drainage, UC: Usual care, QLO: Quality of life
Bias assessment results
Figure 2 presents a summary of the risk of bias for all included studies according to the six main criteria in the Cochrane risk of bias tool. In general, the highest risk of bias among articles was related to allocation concealment, random sequence generation, and blinding of outcome assessment, respectively. Nearly 80% of articles had a lower risk of blindness in the area of blinding patients and personnel.
- Risk of bias summary
Study characteristics
The studies differed in geographical location, design, and type of clinical trial [Table 1]. Sixteen articles was conducted in the United States,[27283133353637394042434445464851] three in Canada,[303447] two in South Korea[3253] and one in China,[41] Germany,[38] Iran,[26] Sweden,[29] England,[52] Turkey,[50] and India.[49] Eighteen studies from 28 included articles were randomized controlled trial (RCT).[28303334353637383939414243454950515253] Study design in one study was non-RCT,[29] and two studies were quasi-experimental.[3140] Another six articles benefited from other clinical trial designs. Moreover, 9 of the articles reported that they were pilot studies.[272833343940444748] The total sample size of each study varied from 21 to 271 individuals. Fifteen studies had a sample size of 21–50, and 4 studies had a sample size of 51–100. The sample size in 9 articles was in the range of 271–100. Control group conditions were not accurately described by all authors. However, in clinical trial studies, especially RCT, the control group should be matched with the overall structure of the intervention group,[54] as the control group's conditions affect the internal validity of the articles.[55] Among RCT-designed articles, only five articles used a matched structured control group with equal sample size as the intervention group.[2941495153]
Participants
Patients in 19 included studies were in stages 0–III of breast cancer diagnose and treatment. Four articles assessed breast cancer survivors.[27333439] Receiving concurrent classical treatment was considered as exclusion criterion. In a study co-administered with CAM, an aromatase inhibitor was used but because it was part of medication therapy, the study remained in review.[28]
Complementary and alternative interventions
Table 2 shows the category of CAM interventions in the included studies and their impact on QOL. None of included articles used herbal medicine as a CAM intervention. Only one article used dietary supplements[26] and the other 27 articles used a variety of mind-body CAM techniques for intervention. Except one article in the mind-body category,[39] all other 27 papers reported a significant effect of CAM interventions on improving QOL of patients. Most articles that showed significant CAM effect had only reported P value and did not mention the confidence interval. There was a great deal of variation in mind-body interventions in this category, but yoga[343840474950] and acupuncture[285153] interventions were more common.
| Category of CAM | First author | CAM | Outcome on QOL (P) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dietary supplements | Aghamohammadi, 2017 | Honey and cinnamon mixture | Independent t-test (0.001) |
| Mind-body techniques | Argenbright, 2016 | Bowen work | Paired sample t-test (0.003) |
| Bao, 2014 | RA | Wilcoxon signed-rank test (0.022) | |
| Carlsson, 2004 | ABCW | Paired sample t-tests (<0.05*) | |
| Carlson, 2013 | MBCR or supportive-expressive therapy | Repeated measures ANOVA (0.005) | |
| Charlson, 2014 | Guided meditation and cognitive-affective-behavioral learning | Paired t-test (0.01) | |
| Cho, 2016 | PT combined with MLD | Independent t-test (<0.001) | |
| Crane-Okada ,2012 | MMP | Two-way repeated-measures analysis (0.02) | |
| Culos-Reed ,2006 | Yoga program | Two-way repeated-measures analysis (<0.01) | |
| Garlick, 2011 | Psycho-spiritual integrative therapy | Repeated measures ANOVA (<0.01) | |
| Gudenkauf, 2015 | CBT | Repeated measures ANOVA (<0.001) | |
| Henderson, 2012 | Mindfulness-based stress-reduction | Independent t-test (<0.05*) | |
| Koch, 2017 | Yoga and meditation | Paired sample t-tests (<0.05*) | |
| Larkey, 2016 | QG/TCE | NS** | |
| Levine, 2012 | Yoga program | Independent t-test (<0.001) | |
| Liu, 2017 | Guolin-qigong | A mixed-effect model (0.002) | |
| Milbury, 2013 | TSM | Repeated measures ANOVA, mental health (<0.05) | |
| Monti, 2013 | MBAT | Mixed effects regression analysis (<0.001) | |
| Mustian, 2004 | TCC | ANOVA (<0.001) | |
| Nidich, 2009 | TM | Repeated measures ANOVA (0.037) | |
| Richardson, 1997 | Imagery/relaxation support | F-test (<0.03) | |
| Speed-Andrews, 2010 | Iyengar yogaprogram | Paired sample t-tests (<0.05*) | |
| Sprod, 2011 | TCC exercise | Repeated measures ANOVA (0.045) | |
| Vadiraja, 2009 | Yoga program | Repeated measures ANOVA (<0.05*) | |
| Vardar Yağlı, 2015 | Yoga combined with aerobic exercise training | Paired sample t-tests (<0.05) | |
| Walker, 2010 | Acupuncture | Repeated measures ANOVA (<0.002) | |
| Williams, 2002 | MLD | Independent t-test (0.006) | |
| Yao, 2016 | Combined acupuncture and moxibustion | Paired sample t-tests (<0.001) |
*For subscales, **NS; P>0.05. NS: Not significant, ANOVA: Analysis of variance, QOL: Quality of life, CAM: Complementary and alternative medicine, RA: Real acupuncture, ABCW: Anthroposophic medicine, MBCR: Mindfulness-based cancer recovery, PT: Physical therapy, MMP: Mindful movement program, CBT: Cognitive-behavioral training, QG/TCE: Qigong/Tai Chi Easy, TSM: Tibetan sound meditation, MBAT: Mindfulness-based art therapy, TCC: Tai Chi Chuan, TM: Transcendental meditation program, MLD: Manual lymphatic drainage
Quality of life outcome
All QOL outcomes were assessed using self-report tools. QOL survey tools were varied. The EORTC QLQ C30 and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) tools were most commonly used in the studies, and each of them was used nine times in the included articles. The Short Form (SF)-36 tool was also used in four articles to measure QOL. Two studies used both SF-36 and FACT-B tools. Each of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-F, FACT-G, men-QOL, and QOL Breast Cancer Questionnaire tools were used in one article. All studies performed QOL measurements at baseline and after the intervention. However, the time intervals for measuring and using the tool for follow-up were different among the articles, and some articles did not measure QOL as follow-up.[26273031343646475053]
DISCUSSION
This systematic review reports evidence of 28 articles, including 18 RCT articles and 10 articles with other experimental, quasi-experimental, and non-RCT designs. These articles contain data related to the outcome of CAM on QOL in patients with breast cancer. Although no time limit was applied to the articles, 18 articles were published after 2010. This study is the first systematic review that examines the impact of CAM according to its category of dietary supplements, herbal medicine, or mind-body techniques on the QOL of women with breast cancer. Despite the great diversity of studies in the type of CAM, study design, duration of interventions, duration of follow-up, and QOL assessment tools, 27 articles reported improvement in overall or subscales of the QOL. Among 28 included studies, only one was in the dietary supplements category, and none was used herbal medicine. Other studies used a variety of mind-body techniques as CAM.
Using CAM in mind-body techniques such as yoga, acupuncture, art therapy, music therapy, guided imagery, cognitive-behavioral stress management, and mental exercise techniques were more than any other CAM interventions, especially herbal medicine or dietary supplements. Therefore, improvement in QOL was also reported in mind-body techniques more than the other two categories. Previous review studies have also emphasized the impact of CAM in mind-body techniques on improving QOL in cancer patients.[72256] In addition, Roberts showed little benefit in their systematic review on the effect of herbal medicines on reducing hot flashes in women with breast cancer.[57] On the other hand, Leggett et al. performed a systematic review on the effect of different CAM methods on cancer symptoms, QOL, and side effects of breast cancer treatment. This review, which examined different types of studies, found insufficient evidence to suggest that CAM has an effect on improving QOL in breast cancer patients. Most of the CAM interventions in included studies in this review were dietary supplements and herbal medicines.[15] However, the effect of yoga as a mind-body technique on QOL improvement in breast cancer patients has been systematically reviewed by Lin et al., but no confirmed findings on the effect of yoga on QOL have been found.[56]
Overlay, the risk of bias was relatively significant among the reviewed studies. One area with high risk of bias was blinding of outcome assessment in the study of QOL, which is based on self-reporting. Kreutz et al. stated that in assessing outcomes that are self-reported, the possibility of blinding of outcome assessment is reduced.[58]
Despite some notable findings from this systematic review, there are some limitations that must be considered when interpreting the findings. First, there was a great deal of heterogeneity in the study design, type of CAM intervention, and type of clinical trial among the studies. Similar interventions also differed in terms of the implementation plan (frequency of intervention, duration, and characteristics of the research population). Second, articles that examined the impact of CAM on QOL in women with breast cancer were more focused on mind-body techniques. Third, in addition to the variation in the mind-body interventions under study, various QOL assessment tools were used. This variation in the types of interventions and outcome measurements did not allow for a meaningful meta-analysis even among the subgroups. Fourth, only English-language articles were included in this review that potentially poses a risk of publication and language bias.
CONCLUSION
The findings of the present review indicate the significant effect of most CAM interventions on QOL in women with breast cancer. Given the increasing prevalence of breast cancer worldwide and the increasing life expectancy of these patients, interventions are needed to improve QOL of these patients. The positive impact of various CAM methods on different aspects of breast cancer patients' lives, such as sleep status, life expectancy, and QOL, has been emphasized in many studies. It seems that the promotion of CAM methods can be a cost-effective care approach in breast cancer patients and recommend by health-care providers. However, there is insufficient evidence of the effectiveness of different types of CAM approaches for the development of clinical guidelines. Therefore, further RCT studies are needed for each type of CAM intervention with more similarity in QOL assessment tools to enable meta-analysis.
Financial support and sponsorship
This research has been supported by Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services (grant number: 35645).
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- The effect of rehabilitation on quality of life in female breast cancer survivors in Iran. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2010;31:105-9.
- [Google Scholar]
- Breast cancer incidence, mortality and mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) are associated with human development, 1990-2016: evidence from Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Breast Cancer. 2019;26:428-45.
- [Google Scholar]
- Global trend of breast cancer mortality rate: A 25-year study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019;20:2015-20.
- [Google Scholar]
- Identification of patterns of breast cancer metastasis among women referred to Isfahan Seyedoshohada center, Iran, between 1999 and 2009 by association rules and ordinal logistic regression. Sci Res J Health Syst Res. 2012;7:746-62.
- [Google Scholar]
- Women's prospect of breast cancer early detection behavior: A qualitative research. 2008:88-102.
- [Google Scholar]
- Preventive health services and lifestyle practices in cancer survivors: A population health investigation. J Cancer Surviv. 2009;3:43-58.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effects of acupuncture, Tuina, Tai Chi, qigong, and traditional Chinese medicine five-element music therapy on symptom management and quality of life for cancer patients: A meta-analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016;51:728-47.
- [Google Scholar]
- Potential role of mind-body therapies in cancer survivorship. Cancer. 2008;112:2607-16.
- [Google Scholar]
- Quality of life in patients with breast cancer before and after diagnosis: An eighteen months follow-up study. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:330.
- [Google Scholar]
- Assessing quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer in Spain by means of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H and N35. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40:614-20.
- [Google Scholar]
- Acupuncture and moxibustion for cancer-related fatigue: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:3067-74.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effects of psycho-behavioral interventions on immune functioning in cancer patients: A systematic review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014;140:15-33.
- [Google Scholar]
- Gender, symptom experience, and use of complementary and alternative medicine practices among cancer survivors in the US cancer population. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010;37:E7-15.
- [Google Scholar]
- The CAM education program of the national center for complementary and alternative medicine: An overview. Acad Med. 2007;82:921-6.
- [Google Scholar]
- The impact of complementary and alternative medicines on cancer symptoms, treatment side effects, quality of life, and survival in women with breast cancer--a systematic review. Nutr Cancer. 2015;67:373-91.
- [Google Scholar]
- Use of complementary and alternative medicine by cancer patients at a Montreal hospital. Integr Cancer Ther. 2011;10:305-11.
- [Google Scholar]
- Complementary and alternative medicine use and assessment of quality of life in Korean breast cancer patients: A descriptive study. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:461-73.
- [Google Scholar]
- Efficacy of complementary therapies in reduction of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients: Systematic review. Complement Med J Fac Nurs Midwifery. 2014;4:831-44.
- [Google Scholar]
- Complementary and alternative therapies among very long-term breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116:387-96.
- [Google Scholar]
- Yoga for improving health-related quality of life, mental health and cancer-related symptoms in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;1:CD010802.
- [Google Scholar]
- Could yoga practice improve treatment-related side effects and quality of life for women with breast cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2017;13:e79-95.
- [Google Scholar]
- Practice of traditional Chinese medicine for psycho-behavioral intervention improves quality of life in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2015;6:39725-39.
- [Google Scholar]
- The effect of complementary and alternative medicine on the quality of life of cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Complement Ther Med. 2013;21:417-29.
- [Google Scholar]
- Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions The Atrium, Southern Gate. England: John Wiley and Sons; 2011.
- Navigating language barriers under difficult circumstances. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:264-9.
- [Google Scholar]
- The effects of honey and cinnamon mixture on improving the quality of life in breast cancer. CrescentJ Med Biol Sci. 2017;4:74-9.
- [Google Scholar]
- Patient-reported outcomes in women with breast cancer enrolled in a dual-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of acupuncture in reducing aromatase inhibitor-induced musculoskeletal symptoms. Cancer. 2014;120:381-9.
- [Google Scholar]
- Contemplative self healing in women breast cancer survivors: A pilot study in underserved minority women shows improvement in quality of life and reduced stress. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14:349.
- [Google Scholar]
- Evaluation of quality of life/life satisfaction in women with breast cancer in complementary and conventional care. Acta Oncol. 2004;43:27-34.
- [Google Scholar]
- Randomized controlled trial of mindfulness-based cancer recovery versus supportive expressive group therapy for distressed survivors of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3119-26.
- [Google Scholar]
- Contemplative self healing in women breast cancer survivors: A pilot study in underserved minority women shows improvement in quality of life and reduced stress. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14:349.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effects of a physical therapy program combined with manual lymphatic drainage on shoulder function, quality of life, lymphedema incidence, and pain in breast cancer patients with axillary web syndrome following axillary dissection. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24:2047-57.
- [Google Scholar]
- Mindful movement program for older breast cancer survivors: A pilot study. Cancer Nurs. 2012;35:E1-13.
- [Google Scholar]
- A pilot study of yoga for breast cancer survivors: Physical and psychological benefits. Psychooncology. 2006;15:891-7.
- [Google Scholar]
- Psycho-spiritual integrative therapy for women with primary breast cancer. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2011;18:78-90.
- [Google Scholar]
- Brief cognitive-behavioral and relaxation training interventions for breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015;83:677-88.
- [Google Scholar]
- The effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on psychosocial outcomes and quality of life in early-stage breast cancer patients: A randomized trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;131:99-109.
- [Google Scholar]
- The effects of yoga and self-esteem on menopausal symptoms and quality of life in breast cancer survivors-A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Maturitas. 2017;105:95-9.
- [Google Scholar]
- Exploratory outcome assessment of Qigong/Tai Chi Easy on breast cancer survivors. Complement Ther Med. 2016;29:196-203.
- [Google Scholar]
- Pilot study of yoga for breast cancer survivors with poor quality of life. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2012;18:241-5.
- [Google Scholar]
- The efficacy of Guolin-Qigong on the body-mind health of Chinese women with breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Qual Life Res. 2017;26:2321-31.
- [Google Scholar]
- Tibetan sound meditation for cognitive dysfunction: Results of a randomized controlled pilot trial. Psychooncology. 2013;22:2354-63.
- [Google Scholar]
- Psychosocial benefits of a novel mindfulness intervention versus standard support in distressed women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2013;22:2565-75.
- [Google Scholar]
- Tai Chi Chuan, health-related quality of life and self-esteem: A randomized trial with breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2004;12:871-6.
- [Google Scholar]
- A randomized controlled trial of the effects of transcendental meditation on quality of life in older breast cancer patients. Integr Cancer Ther. 2009;8:228-34.
- [Google Scholar]
- Coping, life attitudes, and immune responses to imagery and group support after breast cancer treatment. Altern Ther Health Med. 1997;3:62-70.
- [Google Scholar]
- Pilot evaluation of an Iyengar yoga program for breast cancer survivors. Cancer Nurs. 2010;33:369-81.
- [Google Scholar]
- Health-related quality of life and biomarkers in breast cancer survivors participating in Tai Chi Chuan. J Cancer Surviv. 2012;6:146-54.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effects of yoga program on quality of life and affect in early breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy: A randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Med. 2009;17:274-80.
- [Google Scholar]
- Do yoga and aerobic exercise training have impact on functional capacity, fatigue, peripheral muscle strength, and quality of life in breast cancer survivors? Integr Cancer Ther. 2015;14:125-32.
- [Google Scholar]
- Acupuncture versus venlafaxine for the management of vasomotor symptoms in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:634-40.
- [Google Scholar]
- A randomized controlled crossover study of manual lymphatic drainage therapy in women with breast cancer-related lymphoedema. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2002;11:254-61.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effects of warm acupuncture on breast cancer-related chronic lymphedema: a randomized controlled trial. Curr Oncol. 2016;23:e27-34.
- [Google Scholar]
- A scale for rating the quality of psychological trials for pain. Pain. 2005;117:314-25.
- [Google Scholar]
- The selection and design of control conditions for randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions. Psychother Psychosom. 2009;78:275-84.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effects of yoga on psychological health, quality of life, and physical health of patients with cancer: A meta-analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:659876.
- [Google Scholar]
- Safety of herbal medicinal products in women with breast cancer. Maturitas. 2010;66:363-9.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effects of physical and mind-body exercise on sleep problems during and after breast cancer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;176:1-5.
- [Google Scholar]
