Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Addendum
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Conference Abstract
Conference Editorial
Conference Proceedings
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
General Medicine Original Article
General Medicine, Case Report
General Medicine, Review Article
IAPCONKochi 2019 Conference Proceedings
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Narrative Review
Original Article
Palliative Medicine Commentary
Palliative Medicine, Letter to Editor
Palliative Medicine, Letter to the Editor
Palliative Medicine, Original Article
Palliative Medicine, Review Article
Personal Reflection
Perspective
Perspectives
Position Paper
Position Statement
Practitioner Section
Report
REPUBLICATION: Special Article (Guidelines)
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers 2023
Short Communication
Short Report
Special Editorial
Special Review
Systematic Review
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Addendum
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Conference Abstract
Conference Editorial
Conference Proceedings
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
General Medicine Original Article
General Medicine, Case Report
General Medicine, Review Article
IAPCONKochi 2019 Conference Proceedings
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Narrative Review
Original Article
Palliative Medicine Commentary
Palliative Medicine, Letter to Editor
Palliative Medicine, Letter to the Editor
Palliative Medicine, Original Article
Palliative Medicine, Review Article
Personal Reflection
Perspective
Perspectives
Position Paper
Position Statement
Practitioner Section
Report
REPUBLICATION: Special Article (Guidelines)
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers 2023
Short Communication
Short Report
Special Editorial
Special Review
Systematic Review
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Addendum
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Conference Abstract
Conference Editorial
Conference Proceedings
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
General Medicine Original Article
General Medicine, Case Report
General Medicine, Review Article
IAPCONKochi 2019 Conference Proceedings
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Narrative Review
Original Article
Palliative Medicine Commentary
Palliative Medicine, Letter to Editor
Palliative Medicine, Letter to the Editor
Palliative Medicine, Original Article
Palliative Medicine, Review Article
Personal Reflection
Perspective
Perspectives
Position Paper
Position Statement
Practitioner Section
Report
REPUBLICATION: Special Article (Guidelines)
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers 2023
Short Communication
Short Report
Special Editorial
Special Review
Systematic Review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Short Communication
30 (
1
); 89-92
doi:
10.25259/IJPC_243_2023

Advancing Evidence-based Palliative Care Research: Navigating Challenges and Proposing Solutions

Department of Superspeciality Anaesthesiology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot, Gujarat, India
Corresponding author: Khushboo Pandey, D.M. Onco-Anaesthesia, Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot, Gujarat, India. khushboo0411@gmail.com
Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Hoda W, Pandey K. Advancing Evidence-based Palliative Care Research: Navigating Challenges and Proposing Solutions. Indian J Palliat Care. 2024;30:89-92. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_243_2023

Abstract

Amid the increasing demand for palliative care, driven by demographic shifts and medical progress, evidence-based practices face obstacles due to limited research. Complex patient conditions and ethical considerations challenge traditional methodologies, while the absence of comprehensive clinical trials hinders innovative interventions. Empowering practitioners with research skills and establishing a palliative care research network are efforts aimed at bridging these gaps. It is important to emphasise that these initiatives collectively aspire to enhance evidence-based practices, ensuring quality care for individuals facing severe illnesses.

Keywords

Palliative care research
Evidence-based practices
Challenges and solutions
Healthcare paradigm shift
Research methodologies

INTRODUCTION

In recent times, the demand for palliative care has surged, driven by an aging global population and improved diagnostic techniques and therapeutic interventions for terminal illnesses. The primary objectives of palliative care involve the provision of optimal supportive care and the alleviation of distressing symptoms. However, the lack of substantiated research in this field poses significant challenges to achieving evidence-based practices.[1]

The landscape of healthcare has experienced a paradigm shift, with palliative care emerging as a critical domain. As life expectancy rises and medical advancements continue, there is an increasing need for palliative care services that offer comprehensive support and symptom relief to individuals dealing with terminal illnesses.[2] Nevertheless, within this growing necessity, a substantial challenge exists: The scarcity of well-founded research in palliative medicine.

UNPACKING THE CHALLENGE: THE LACK OF VALIDATED LITERATURE

Despite its vital significance, palliative care research encounters a distinct set of obstacles that hinder the establishment of evidence-based practices. The intricate nature of patients’ conditions, characterised by unpredictable disease trajectories and complex symptom manifestations, presents inherent barriers to conventional research methodologies.[3] Furthermore, ethical considerations surrounding the inclusion of vulnerable patients add another layer of complexity. The personalised treatment goals of terminally ill patients contribute to the formation of a diverse patient cohort, complicating the task of assembling a substantial and homogeneous sample size for meaningful research.[4]

In addition, the scarcity of comprehensive clinical trials in this field limits the availability of foundational studies that typically serve as catalysts for further investigation. This scarcity obstructs the advancement of evidence-based protocols and hinders the generation of innovative hypotheses for future exploration.

ILLUMINATING THE PATH FORWARD: INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS

Recognising these challenges, the palliative care community is actively seeking solutions to facilitate evidence-based research, which is essential for informing effective care provision. One promising avenue involves adapting research protocols to incorporate research leadership and capacity-building components.[5] This approach enables researchers to leverage the expertise of experienced leaders to guide studies and cultivate research skills among newcomers.

Another encouraging approach is the utilisation of non-randomised controlled trials (non-RCTs) with equivalent rigor and scale. Various non-RCT designs, such as observational cohort studies, propensity score matching, pre-post studies, interrupted time series analysis, non-randomized comparative studies, retrospective studies, pragmatic trials, and qualitative research, offer feasible and valuable alternatives to traditional RCTs in palliative care research, allowing flexibility in methodology based on the research question and resource availability.[6-10] These pragmatic alternatives to traditional RCTs can provide valuable insights into the efficacy of palliative care interventions.

In addition, embracing a mixed-methods research approach holds immense potential. By combining diverse research tools and methodologies, a comprehensive understanding of intricate patient experiences can be achieved, leading to more holistic and impactful care strategies.[11]

Pilot feasibility studies emerge as a practical solution to refine research logistics and test hypotheses before embarking on larger endeavours. This preliminary phase assists researchers in fine-tuning their methodologies and anticipating potential challenges, ultimately enhancing the quality of subsequent studies.

Furthermore, the dissemination of research knowledge among palliative care practitioners through tailor-made training modules and research-oriented curricula is of paramount importance.[12] Empowering these practitioners with research acumen allows them to actively contribute to the growth of evidence-based practices within their field.

Finally, establishing and maintaining a palliative care research network (PCRN) dedicated to fostering collaboration and disseminating research outcomes within different palliative care settings would be another significant step toward bridging the research gap.[13] Establishing the PCRN in India would be a vital step to enhancing palliative care quality and bridging research gaps. PCRN’s core objectives involve nurturing palliative care scholars, developing research programs, promoting collaboration, securing funding, raising awareness, upholding ethical guidelines, employing rigorous research methodologies, and continuously evaluating its impact.[14,15] To implement PCRN, it is essential to commit dedicated resources, foster collaboration, and align activities with core objectives. The ultimate goal is to improve palliative care quality, enhance patient outcomes, and contribute to the well-being of those facing severe illnesses. The specific methodology for implementing PCRN may be in India when compared to developed countries. However, it should remain aligned with the fundamental components and objectives, ensuring a standardised approach to palliative care research and fostering collaboration within different palliative care settings.

Figure 1 outlines the key points regarding advancing evidence-based palliative care while proposing solutions for the challenges.[16]

Figure 1:
Key challenges and solutions for evidence-based palliative care research.

CONCLUSION

In summary, the barriers presented by the scarcity of well-founded research in palliative medicine are formidable. Nonetheless, by embracing innovative methodologies, investing in capacity building, and fostering a collaborative research environment, the palliative care community can conquer these challenges. As we confront these obstacles head-on, we are laying the foundation for an era of evidence-based practices that genuinely cater to the needs of individuals facing serious illnesses. Through collective efforts, we can ensure that palliative care remains a steadfast source of support and relief for patients and their families. In doing so, we honour the essence of palliative care – enhancing the quality of life for those in their most vulnerable moments.

Ethical approval

The Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent was not required as there are no patients in this study.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

References

  1. . Barriers to Hospice and Palliative Care Research A Patient-Centered Approach to Intervention Studies. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2020;24:227-30.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. Gaps in Hospice and Palliative Care Research: A Scoping Review of the North American Literature. J Aging Res. 2020;2020:3921245.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. . Research Challenges in Palliative and End of Life Care. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2016;6:2-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Why is High-quality Research on Palliative Care So Hard to Do? Barriers to Improved Research from a Swing of Palliative Care Researchers. J Palliat Med. 2014;17:782-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Barriers and Facilitators to Knowledge Transfer and Exchange in Palliative Care Research. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018;23:131-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. . Propensity Scores and Palliative Care. J Palliat Med. 2014;17:261.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. . Conducting Interrupted Time-Series Analysis for Single-and Multiple-group Comparisons. The Stata J 2015. ;. ;15:480-500.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Study Design, Precision, and Validity in Observational Studies. J Palliat Med. 2009;12:77-82.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . Overcoming Recruitment Challenges in Palliative Care Clinical Trials. J Oncol Pract. 2013;9:277-82.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , . Alternative Consent Models in Pragmatic Palliative Care Clinical Trials. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021;62:183-91.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Establishing Research in a Palliative Care Clinical Setting: Perceived Barriers and Implemented Strategies. Appl Nurs Res. 2014;27:78-83.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . Patient and Carer Involvement in Palliative Care Research: An Integrative Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Review. Palliat Med. 2019;33:969-84.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . Symptom Control Research. J Palliat Med. 2022;25:1462-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Available from: https://pcrnv.com.au [Last accessed on 2023 Nov 03]
  15. , , , , , , et al. A Call for Increased Paediatric Palliative Care Research: Identifying Barriers. Palliat Med. 2016;30:979-80.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections