Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Addendum
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Conference Abstract
Conference Editorial
Conference Proceedings
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
General Medicine Original Article
General Medicine, Case Report
General Medicine, Review Article
IAPCONKochi 2019 Conference Proceedings
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Notice of Retraction
Oral Abstracts
Original Article
Palliative Medicine Commentary
Palliative Medicine, Letter to Editor
Palliative Medicine, Letter to the Editor
Palliative Medicine, Original Article
Palliative Medicine, Review Article
Personal Reflection
Perspective
Perspectives
Position Paper
Position Statement
Poster Abstracts
Practitioner Section
Report
REPUBLICATION: Special Article (Guidelines)
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers 2023
Short Communication
Short Report
Special Editorial
Special Review
Systematic Review
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Addendum
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Conference Abstract
Conference Editorial
Conference Proceedings
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
General Medicine Original Article
General Medicine, Case Report
General Medicine, Review Article
IAPCONKochi 2019 Conference Proceedings
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Notice of Retraction
Oral Abstracts
Original Article
Palliative Medicine Commentary
Palliative Medicine, Letter to Editor
Palliative Medicine, Letter to the Editor
Palliative Medicine, Original Article
Palliative Medicine, Review Article
Personal Reflection
Perspective
Perspectives
Position Paper
Position Statement
Poster Abstracts
Practitioner Section
Report
REPUBLICATION: Special Article (Guidelines)
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers 2023
Short Communication
Short Report
Special Editorial
Special Review
Systematic Review
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Addendum
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Conference Abstract
Conference Editorial
Conference Proceedings
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
General Medicine Original Article
General Medicine, Case Report
General Medicine, Review Article
IAPCONKochi 2019 Conference Proceedings
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Notice of Retraction
Oral Abstracts
Original Article
Palliative Medicine Commentary
Palliative Medicine, Letter to Editor
Palliative Medicine, Letter to the Editor
Palliative Medicine, Original Article
Palliative Medicine, Review Article
Personal Reflection
Perspective
Perspectives
Position Paper
Position Statement
Poster Abstracts
Practitioner Section
Report
REPUBLICATION: Special Article (Guidelines)
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers 2023
Short Communication
Short Report
Special Editorial
Special Review
Systematic Review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
25 (
3
); 403-406
doi:
10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_64_19

High Prevalence of Dyspnea in Lung Cancer: An Observational Study

Department of Palliative Medicine, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Department of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Care Centre, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Arunangshu Ghoshal, MB-G-75, Department of Palliative Medicine, Tata Memorial Centre, Dr. E Borges’ Road, Parel, Mumbai - 400 012, Maharashtra, India. E-mail: arun.bata@yahoo.com

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Introduction:

Dyspnea is a subjective, multidimensional experience of breathing discomfort, commonly seen in patients with advanced cancer. This study is a secondary analysis to seek the clinical prevalence of dyspnea on a subset of patients with lung cancer. Improving the quality of life (QoL) in dyspnea requires aggressive symptom management, which in turn entails a detailed understanding of its symptomatology.

Materials and Methods:

This was a subset analysis of lung cancer patients of a prospective observational study done over 6 months from April to September 2014 at the Department of Palliative Medicine, Tata Memorial Centre (Mumbai).

Results and Conclusions:

About 71.43% of the patients with advanced lung cancer experienced dyspnea. Dyspnea increased with worsening fatigue, anxiety, appetite, and well-being. Patients described it as an increased sense of effort for breathing, and it lowered the QoL substantially.

Keywords

Dyspnea
lung cancer
palliative care
prevalence

INTRODUCTION

The terms “breathlessness” and “dyspnea” have been used interchangeably in literature and often point to the same sensation of difficult/labored breathing.[1] It is one of the most common symptoms in advanced cancer.[2] In a systematic review by Viniol et al. in 2015, the authors report that 0.8%–0.59% of the general population experiences dyspnea.[1] Analysis of secondary data from the World Health Survey 2002 for India reports these figures as 7.2% – much higher than elsewhere in the world. Lung cancer is one of the most common causes of dyspnea seen in 60% of such patients.[3] A cross-sectional study done in our center by Damani et al. reported the clinical prevalence of dyspnea as 44.37% in patients with advanced cancer.[4] The concept of “dyspnea” as a symptom has seen marked evolution in recent times and has led to expert consensus on the term “chronic breathlessness syndrome” – defined as breathlessness that persists despite optimal treatment of the underlying pathophysiology, resulting in disability. Interestingly, a stated duration is not needed for classifying it as “chronic.”[5] Seminal work has been done in Europe but not in India where the burden is probably more.[6] This study is a secondary analysis to seek the clinical prevalence of dyspnea on a subset of patients with lung cancer. The findings will help us understand the magnitude of dyspnea in patients with lung cancer and prioritize symptom management based on its associations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a subset analysis of lung cancer patients of a prospective observational study done over 6 months from April to September 2014 at the Department of Palliative Medicine, Tata Memorial Centre (Mumbai). All patients presenting to the outpatient clinic of the palliative care service were screened and accrued as per the inclusion criteria – all literate adult patients with advanced lung cancer with normal cognitive status with the ability to understand the nature of the study and who provided informed consent. We excluded patients on ventilators/noninvasive ventilation or on disease-modifying therapy. Compensation in any form was not provided for taking part in this study, and diligence was taken to protect patients’ confidentiality. The trial is registered with Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI REF/2014/05/006948). All study-related procedures including data collection were done by the author and coauthors; all physicians trained in palliative medicine who did a one-time assessment of the participants during their first visit. It involved medical consultation, recording of sociodemographic information, symptom scores using Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), performance score using Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale, dyspnea by Cancer Dyspnea Scale (CDS), and quality of life (QoL) of the patients using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Core 15 Palliative (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL) questionnaire.

RESULTS

A sample of 500 patients was recruited for the original study, of which 42 (8.4%) had primary cancer of the lung.

Demographic and clinical information

Twenty-three (54.8%) were men. The median age of all patients with lung cancer was 58 years (range 34–80 years). All had Stage IV cancer, three (7.14%) patients had respiratory comorbidities, while nine (21.43%) had cardiovascular comorbidities.

Symptomatology

Fifteen (35.7%) patients had poor performance status (ECOG 3). At the initial visit, 30 patients screened positive for dyspnea on ESAS, which gives a clinical prevalence of 71.43%. On the CDS, perceived sense of effort for breathing was a major component, with a mean value of 4.36 (standard deviation 4.33) as compared to other two components (i.e., sense of anxiety and sense of discomfort). The patients had good emotional functioning but comparatively poor physical functioning. Major symptoms affecting QoL were pain, loss of appetite, and breathlessness [Table 1].

Table 1 Descriptive statistics on demographics and clinical data (n=42)
Number of patients (%)
Gender distribution
 Male 23 (54.8)
 Female 19 (45.2)
Income groups* (USD/month)
 <25.17 1 (2.4)
 25.17-75.22 23 (54.8)
 75.23-125.52 10 (23.8)
 125.53-188.45 6 (14.3)
 188.46-251.37 2 (4.8)
Education
 Illiterate 5 (11.9)
 Primary-school certificate 17 (40.5)
 Middle-school certificate 8 (19.0)
 High-school certificate 4 (9.5)
 Graduate and above 8 (19.0)
Marital status
 Married and living with a spouse 36 (85.7)
 Widow 5 (11.9)
 Widower 1 (2.4)
Treatment received
 Multimodal 11 (26.2)
 Chemotherapy 22 (52.4)
 Radiotherapy 3 (7.1)
 None 6 (14.3)
Comorbidities
 None 23 (54.76)
 Diabetes mellitus 4 (9.52)
 Hypertension 5 (11.9)
 Ischemic heart disease 2 (4.76)
 COPD 2 (4.76)
 Hypothyroidism 1 (2.38)
 Asthma 1 (2.38)
 Others 2 (4.76)
 Multiple 2 (4.76)
ECOG score
 0 0 (0.00)
 1 9 (21.4)
 2 10 (23.8)
 3 15 (35.7)
 4 8 (19.0)
ESAS items None (0) (%) Mild (1-3) (%) Moderate (4-6) (%) Severe (7-10) (%)
Pain 11 (26.2 ) 10 (23.81) 13 (30.95) 8 (19.05)
Fatigue 0 (0.0) 12 (28.57) 17 (40.48) 13 (30.95)
Nausea 28 (66.67) 14 (33.33) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Depression 28 (66.67) 12 (28.57) 1 (2.38) 1 (2.38)
Anxiety 14 (33.33) 13 (30.95) 14 (33.33) 1 (2.38)
Drowsiness 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Appetite 0 (0.0) 5 (11.90 ) 19 (45.24 ) 18 (42.86)
Well-being 0 (0.0) 7 (16.67) 23 (54.76) 12 (28.57)
Dyspnea 0 (0.0) 12 (28.57) 9 (21.43) 9 (21.43)
Dyspnea scoring in CDS
Items Minimum Maximum Mean SD
Factor 1 (effort) 0.00 17.00 4.36 4.33
Factor 2 (anxiety) 0.00 12.00 1.40 2.36
Factor 3 (discomfort) 0.00 11.00 1.81 2.41
Total score 0.00 40.00 7.57 8.53
QoL scores in EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL
Items Mean SD
Overall QoL (higher values indicating a higher QoL) 44.44 25.94
Function scales (higher values indicating better functioning)
 Physical functioning 38.41 29.94
 Emotional functioning 68.47 17.0
Symptom scales (higher values indicating greater presence)
 Dyspnea 42.06 36.85
 Pain 50.79 28.02
 Insomnia 38.09 29.96
 Fatigue 64.02 22.88
 Appetite loss 48.41 25.72
 Nausea/vomiting 3.98 7.19
 Constipation 18.25 26.75

*According to the Kuppuswamy’s socioeconomic status scale with updated income range. QoL: Quality of life, EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Core 15 Palliative, SD: Standard deviation, CDS: Cancer Dyspnea Scale, ESAS: Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

Factors influencing dyspnea

Significant correlations of dyspnea (P < 0.05) were found with ESAS items such as fatigue (r = 0.603), anxiety (r = 0.44), appetite (r = −0.332), and well-being (r = −0.509) and were also found with global QoL score (r = −0.574), physical functioning (r = −0.574), sleep (r = 0.471), and appetite (r = 0.423) on EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL.

DISCUSSION

This study shows that breathlessness is a common symptom in patients with advanced lung cancer (seen in 71.43%) – higher than seen in a systematic review (19%–51%).[3] This is probably because none of the research articles included were from India and can also be attributed to differences in patient selection, lack of clear symptom definition, and variation in dyspnea measurement techniques. In our study, patients reported the perceived sense of effort of breathlessness as most bothersome. This was also associated with multiple other symptoms – fatigue, anxiety, appetite, and loss of well-being items on ESAS and lower QoL in the patients. These were consistent with a study done by Polanski et al.[7] Scoping search on breathlessness in lung cancer in the Indian context showed no published literature. Major strengths of this study lie in its prospective design and usage of validated tools. There are a few limitations – these results are from a subset analysis of the original larger study, and there are chances of selection bias. To overcome it, we matched the relative proportion of lung cancer patients in our cohort with annual hospital data which was comparable. There might be contributory thoracic pathology which might overestimate the prevalence of dyspnea; however, as a part of standard care, most of our patients would have been treated for underlying correctable causes for dyspnea. The use of single-item tool (ESAS) to measure anxiety and depression might be inadequate; instead, a more specific tool such as the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale would have been better.[8] The temporal relationship between dyspnea and QoL cannot be evaluated in this study because both were assessed at the same time.

Future studies should consider longitudinal designs on wider populations, also qualitative research to gain a deeper understanding of the issues affecting breathlessness.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of breathlessness in lung cancer patients was high (71.43%). Patients described it as an increased sense of effort for breathing, and it was associated with multiple factors such as fatigue, anxiety, and low QoL.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge patients, their relatives, and staff of the Department of Palliative Medicine, Tata Memorial Centre, and Professor Miriam Johnson, MD, FRCP, MRCP, MBChB (Hons), Professor of Palliative Medicine, Hull York Medical School, for the idea behind this paper.

REFERENCES

  1. , , , , , , . Studies of the symptom dyspnoea: A systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16:152.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Dyspnea, a symptom with multifactorial causes. Rev Infirm. 2013;(187):34-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Dyspnea in lung cancer patients: A systematic review. Lung Cancer (Auckl). 2010;1:141-50.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Prevalence and intensity of dyspnea in advanced cancer and its impact on quality of life. Indian J Palliat Care. 2018;24:44-50.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Towards an expert consensus to delineate a clinical syndrome of chronic breathlessness. Eur Respir J. 2017;49 pii: 1602277
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Burden of asthma, dyspnea, and chronic cough in South Asia. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017;12:1093-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . Quality of life of patients with lung cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:1023-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361-70.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections