Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Conference Abstract
Conference Editorial
Conference Proceedings
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
General Medicine Original Article
General Medicine, Case Report
IAPCONKochi 2019 Conference Proceedings
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Narrative Review
Original Article
Palliative Medicine Commentary
Palliative Medicine, Letter to Editor
Palliative Medicine, Letter to the Editor
Personal Reflection
Perspective
Perspectives
Position Paper
Position Statement
Practitioner Section
Report
REPUBLICATION: Special Article (Guidelines)
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Report
Special Editorial
Special Review
Systematic Review
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Conference Abstract
Conference Editorial
Conference Proceedings
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
General Medicine Original Article
General Medicine, Case Report
IAPCONKochi 2019 Conference Proceedings
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Narrative Review
Original Article
Palliative Medicine Commentary
Palliative Medicine, Letter to Editor
Palliative Medicine, Letter to the Editor
Personal Reflection
Perspective
Perspectives
Position Paper
Position Statement
Practitioner Section
Report
REPUBLICATION: Special Article (Guidelines)
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Report
Special Editorial
Special Review
Systematic Review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
28 (
3
); 314-320
doi:
10.25259/IJPC_7_2022

Perspectives of Respiratory Physicians toward Need and Integration of Palliative Care in Advanced Respiratory Diseases

Department of Palliative Care and Psychooncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Palliative Care Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
Palliative Care Unit, Kolhapur Cancer Centre, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India
Department of Palliative Care, Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Department of Pulmonology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Bombay Hospital and Bhatia Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Corresponding author: Shrikant Atreya, Department of Palliative Care and Psychooncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. atreyashrikant@gmail.com
Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Atreya S, Jeba J, Patil CR, Iyer R, Christopher DJ, Rajan S. Perspectives of respiratory physicians toward need and integration of palliative care in advanced respiratory diseases. Indian J Palliat Care 2022;28:314-20.

Abstract

Objectives:

Patients with chronic life-limiting or advanced respiratory diseases often suffer from high symptom burden, requiring palliative care to alleviate symptoms, improve quality of life and restore dignity. The present study explored the perception of respiratory physicians and their current practice of integrating palliative care for adult patients with chronic advanced respiratory diseases.

Materials and Methods:

An exploratory survey method using Google survey forms and SurveyMonkey was emailed to respiratory physicians between December 2020 and May 2021.

Results:

One hundred and seventy-two respiratory physicians responded to the survey. The majority of respiratory physicians (n = 153; 88.9%) thought that early integration of palliative care early was beneficial. They did not feel referring to palliative care would result in loss of control on patient care (n = 107; 62.21%) and 66 (38.37%) strongly disagreed that the referral would result in a loss of hope in patients. Further exploration into the training needs of respiratory physicians revealed that 121 (70.35%) felt the need for training in end-of-life care.

Conclusion:

Respiratory physicians in our study had an inclination toward palliative care integration into their routine clinical practice. A majority of them expressed the need to enhance their skills in palliative care. Therefore, concerted efforts at integration and a mutual exchange of knowledge between respiratory physicians and palliative care physicians will ensure that patients with advanced respiratory diseases are provided high-quality palliative care.

Keywords

Pulmonary disease
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Palliative care
Pulmonologists

INTRODUCTION

Chronic life-limiting or advanced respiratory diseases are progressive and debilitating in nature and rank 3rd among the causes of life-limiting illnesses across the globe.[1] Chronic life-limiting or advanced respiratory diseases in India account for 32% of the global disability-adjusted life years (DALY).[2] There was a steep rise in the prevalence of chronic life-limiting or advanced respiratory diseases between 1990 and 2016, with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) accounting for 29% and asthma for 9% of the cases in the country.[2] COPD and asthma contributed to a major proportion of deaths, as high as 10.9% and 8.7%, respectively.[2] They also accounted for the highest causes of disability-adjusted life years.[2] Non-malignant chronic respiratory diseases, in comparison with their malignant counterparts, are more indolent in nature, with acute exacerbations of symptoms requiring recurrent hospitalisations.[3] Patients suffer from a single worsening symptom or cluster of symptoms that impose limitations on activities of daily living,[4,5] which is further compounded by comorbidities.[6] Pain (54.4%), dyspnoea (84.2%), fatigue (81.4%), dry mouth (80.3%), insomnia (64%), depression (54.8%) and anxiety (52.5%) were among the most common and most distressing symptoms.[7] The physical and emotional distress affects both patients and caregivers alike, with caregivers particularly requiring recourse.[8] This demands a systematic screening of physical and psychosocial symptoms and incorporation of palliative care into routine clinical care.[5,7]

Palliative care focuses on mitigating symptoms through an interdisciplinary team and provides holistic care to patients and families as a unit. Studies have established the role of palliative care in reducing the burden of healthcare expenditure and improving the health of patients with life-limiting diseases.[9,10] Although patients receiving palliative care for chronic respiratory diseases are known to benefit from specialist palliative care inputs, many fail to receive it unless referred for terminal care.[10] Referral to palliative care is influenced by the attitude and knowledge that physicians have about palliative care.[11] Evidence suggests that clinicians associated palliative care with end of life and underestimated the proportion of their patients requiring palliative care.[12,13] Only a few physicians saw palliative care as something other than terminal or end-of-life care. Other reasons for hesitation in referrals were fear of upsetting their patients, stealing hope, unwilling to abandon their patients, seeing referral as an admission of failure, and not understanding the benefits of referral.[9]

Respiratory physicians serve as gatekeepers of referrals to palliative care. Their knowledge of facilitators and barriers in palliative care referral will influence the utilisation of the service. The present study explored the perception of respiratory physicians and the current practice of integration of palliative care for adult patients with chronic advanced respiratory diseases. It also attempted to learn the needs, facilitators, and barriers as perceived by respiratory physicians toward integration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design

Approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Tata Medical Center, Kolkata (reference number: 2020/TMC/207/IRB65). The study used an exploratory survey method. The participants included respiratory physicians providing care to adult patients in hospital and community settings. The survey questionnaire was emailed to respiratory physicians who were registered with the Indian Chest Society (ICS). The questionnaire was designed after a thorough literature search followed by the consensus of the respiratory physicians. The questionnaire comprised of multiple-choice questions. The survey was finalised after all the authors unanimously agreed on its readability, concept clarity, and user-friendliness. The survey was posted online and contained an inbuilt consent form. Google Forms and SurveyMonkey were the online portals used to conduct this survey. Information related to the study and informed consent form was provided on the first page of the survey form. Data were collected between December 2020 and May 2021.

Inclusion criteria

Eligible participants were respiratory physicians providing care to adult patients in hospital or community settings.

Study setting, sampling and data collection methods

The questionnaire either as Google Forms or SurveyMonkey was emailed to all the respiratory physicians registered with the ICS database. Since the consent form was inbuilt in the online questionnaire, the participants who agreed to participate had to click on the mandatory submit button (thus consenting to participate) to proceed with the study. The time taken to respond to the survey questionnaire was 10 min.

Data analysis

The data were collected and compiled using Google Forms and SurveyMonkey. The analysis was done using Epi Info (Version 7.2; CDC, Atlanta). The qualitative variables were expressed in terms of frequencies and percentages. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was employed to determine the data’s normality. Normal quantitative data were depicted as mean and standard deviation and non-normal data as median and interquartile range.

Ethical consideration

Participation in the study was voluntary and only participants who clicked on the submit button after reading the consent form could proceed with the study. All fields were mandatory to respond to proceed to the submit button. Participants could withdraw at any time during the survey and the responses generated were null and void on withdrawal from the study. The investigator ensured the anonymity of participants by keeping all related identifiers such as names, places of work, and residential addresses confidential.

RESULTS

The survey was emailed to all respiratory physicians registered with the ICS database (n = 2400) of whom 172 physicians responded. Demographic details collected from the physicians revealed an average age of 44.7 years (SD = 10.4). In all, 119 (69.19%) of the respondents were male. One hundred and eighteen (68.6%) of the respondents had a postgraduate degree (MD) in respiratory or internal medicine followed by 23.88% of respondents with a diploma degree in respiratory medicine (n = 41). The median years of experience as a respiratory physician were 14 years (IQR – 7.50–23 years). The majority of the physicians (n = 91; 53.21%) worked in private hospitals or private practice.

The median number of patients with advanced respiratory diseases seen by the respiratory physicians (in the past 1 month) was 27.50 (IQR: 11.50–60). Only 13 (7.56%) physicians provided palliative care themselves. Only 58 (33.72%) of physicians had access to a specialist palliative care physician in their institution. However, 108 (62.79%) had access to a specialist palliative care physician within a 50 km radius. One hundred and thirty-five (78.48%) physicians involved a multidisciplinary team. Although, physiotherapists (n = 105; 77.78%) and psychologists/ psychiatrists (n = 81; 60%) more often formed a part of their interdisciplinary team, 61 (45.19%) physicians referred their patients to palliative care physicians [Table 1].

Table 1:: Current provision of palliative care in the country.
Current provision of palliative care Frequency Percentage
Number of patients with advanced respiratory diseases seen during the past month (Median [IQR]) 27.50 [11.50 to 60.00]
In what percent of such patients have you been able to provide palliative care either yourself or through referral to a specialist palliative care physician?
<10% 95 55.25
10% to 50% 49 28.49
50% to 75% 15 8.72
75% to 100% 13 7.56
Number of patients with lung cancer seen during the past month (Median [IQR]) 4 [2 to 10]
In what percent of such patients have you been able to provide palliative care either yourself or through referral to a specialist palliative care physician?
<10% 79 47.31
10% to 50% 49 29.34
50% to 75% 21 12.57
75% to 100% 18 10.78
Do you have access to specialist palliative care in the same institution?
Yes 58 33.72
No 114 66.28
Do you have access to specialist palliative care within a radius of 50 km?
Yes 108 62.79
No 64 37.21
Have you used PARENTERAL morphine in your clinical practice?
Yes 70 40.70
No 102 59.30
If yes, for what indication (n=70)
Pain 20 28.57
Dyspnoea 44 62.86
Cough 59 84.29
Have you used ORAL morphine in your clinical practice?
Yes 102 59.30
No 70 40.70
If yes, for what indication (n=102)
Pain 81 79.41
Dyspnoea 48 47.06
Cough 29 28.43
Do you provide multidisciplinary care to patients with advanced respiratory disease?
Yes 135 78.49
No 37 21.51
Who are part of this multidisciplinary team (n=135)
Palliative care physician 61 45.19
Nurse 96 71.11
Medical Social Worker 49 36.30
Physiotherapist 105 77.78
Psychologist/Psychiatrist 81 60.00
Counsellor/volunteer 52 38.32
Others 4 2.96

The study explored their perception regarding the stage at which integrating palliative care would be appropriate. While 153 (88.95%) respiratory physicians perceived early integration of palliative care as beneficial, 42 (24.42%) felt the need for integration only for terminal care. The study further explored the perspectives of respiratory physicians regarding facilitators and barriers to integrating palliative care into the clinical care of patients with advanced respiratory diseases. The study revealed that respiratory physicians perceived integrating with palliative care as beneficial and felt comfortable discussing palliative care with their patients (n = 78; 45.35%) and did not feel referring to palliative care that would result in loss of control on patient care (n = 107; 62.21%). Sixty-six (38.37%) physicians strongly disagreed that the referral would result in a sense of abandonment or loss of hope in patients. A total of 114 (66.28%) shared an amicable partnership with the palliative care team, and 129 (75%) felt the need to upgrade their expertise in basic palliative care [Table 2].

Table 2:: Perceptions of Respiratory Physicians about the role of palliative care in advanced respiratory diseases.
Perception related questions Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree
Nor % Nor % Nor % Nor %
It is beneficial to work hand in hand with palliative care early on in the management of advanced respiratory diseases (for e.g., for symptom management or psychosocial or spiritual support) 3 1.74 2 1.16 14 8.14 153 88.95
It is useful to integrate palliative care when the respiratory distress is even after the use of all available therapeutic options 6 3.49 6 3.49 9 5.23 151 87.79
It is useful to integrate palliative care when the physical decline begins 7 4.07 9 5.23 18 10.47 138 80.23
It is useful to integrate palliative care when the need to discuss goals of care and advance care planning arises 3 1.74 6 3.49 22 12.79 141 81.98
It is important to integrate palliative care when the patient/family ask about or for palliative care 17 9.88 7 4.07 21 12.21 127 73.84
It is useful to integrate palliative care only when the patient is in the end of life. 103 59.88 17 9.88 10 5.81 42 24.42
Barriers
Uncomfortable in discussing palliative care with my patients 78 45.35 31 18.02 41 23.84 22 12.79
Patients would have a sense of abandonment/loss of hope when referred to palliative care 66 38.37 26 15.12 37 21.51 43 25.00
Referral to palliative care will result in the loss of my autonomy in patient care 107 62.21 28 16.28 20 11.63 17 9.88
Lack of training and skills in providing palliative care 23 13.37 31 18.02 32 18.60 86 50.00
Unaware of palliative care service in the locality of my practice 81 47.09 24 13.95 20 11.63 47 27.33
I am unclear as to who needs palliative care 122 70.39 24 13.95 15 8.72 11 6.40
I am unclear as to when I should involve or integrate palliative care in advanced respiratory disease 106 61.63 28 16.26 20 11.63 18 10.47
Facilitators
Confidence and good working relationship with the palliative care team 14 8.14 14 8.14 30 17.44 114 66.28
Good network palliative care team within the institution or area of practice 27 15.70 14 8.14 32 18.60 99 57.56
More training and up skilling in the provision of basic palliative care 10 5.81 7 4.07 26 15.12 129 75.43

Nor: Number, %: Percentage

The researchers were interested in learning about the training requirements in palliative care as expressed by respiratory physicians. Only 72 (41.86%) physicians had undergone some training in basic palliative care and only 28 (16.26%) and 23 (23.35%) physicians were confident in providing non-malignant and malignant palliative care, respectively. Furthermore, the study explored the areas of palliative care where the physicians expressed their needs for training. In all, 121 (70.35%) physicians expressed their need for training in pain and symptom management followed by end-of-life care (n = 113; 65.70%) and communication skills (n = 107; 62.21%) [Table 3].

Table 3:: Perceived need of training in palliative care among respiratory physicians.
Perceived need on training in p alliative care Frequ e n c y Percentage
I have had some training in the basics of palliative care
No 100 58.14
Yes 72 41.86
If yes, I am confident in offering basic palliative care to patients with advanced respiratory diseases? (n=72; 0-no confidence to 5-confident)
0 1 1.39
1 1 1.39
2 13 18.06
3 16 22.22
4 18 25.00
5 23 31.94
Learning needs in Palliative care
Pain and symptom management 121 70.35
End of life care 113 65.70
Communication skills 107 62.21
Ethical considerations in decisions of end of life 84 48.84

DISCUSSION

Despite advancements in the management of respiratory diseases, many diseases still have a dismal prognosis. This holds true for not only malignancy but also for non-malignant chronic respiratory diseases conditions such as severe COPD, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, and neuromuscular disorders, leading to respiratory failure.[14] The trigger for palliative care integration is more disease-based rather than needs-based.[15] Some of these triggers include recurrent hospitalisations for acute exacerbation of symptoms, poor respiratory function, increasing symptom burden, deterioration in the functional status, increasing demand for advanced respiratory therapies and progressive recalcitrant disease.[15] Recent randomised controlled trials on early palliative care for patients with chronic life-limiting or advanced respiratory diseases have demonstrated significant reductions in breathlessness intensity, improvement in DALY, and alleviation of depressive symptoms.[16] Patients also reported improvement in confidence, function, and better control of their breathlessness.[16] Early introduction of palliative care is known to reduce hospital admissions, emergency visits, and utilisation of intensive care units.[17] It also aids in the fulfillment of patient’s wishes to spend the final hours of life as well as the provision of opioids for symptom relief.[17] Palliative care integration improved their coping mechanisms by way of physical and emotional symptom alleviation, prognostic awareness, increased understanding of the care plan, and higher acceptance of advance care planning.[18,19]

Respiratory physicians play a pivotal role in providing palliative care for advanced respiratory diseases, so exploring their perceptions about palliative care integration, challenges in palliative care provision, and their need for training in palliative care, providing primary palliative and referral to specialists are important.[20] In our study respiratory physicians provided care to a high proportion of patients with advanced respiratory diseases, and almost half of them discussed palliative care with their patients and caregivers. However, only one-third were able to facilitate palliative care. This discordance in the numbers seen and referrals to palliative care could be influenced by factors such as inability to accurately predict the prognosis, time constraints, and limited resources.[21,22] The study also reported a lack of clarity in timing for initiating palliative care. However, our study revealed contrasting results. Respiratory physicians in our study clearly delineated curative from palliative care and seemed to feel that palliative care should be integrated early. The other cause of discordance could come from patients or families who may be averse to discussing palliative care with their physician.[23,24] Furthermore, they perceive the condition as non-fatal due to the prolonged course of the disease that helps them adapt to it.[25] Whereas most respiratory physicians felt the need for early integration, they equally felt that it was essential to consider the patient/family’s perspective for such a referral.[26,27]

Most respiratory physicians recognised the importance of early integration of palliative care for advanced respiratory diseases, and only a minority believed that palliative care could be provided at the end of life reveal an attitudinal shift. The findings corroborate with a study by Narsvage et al.[28] where the participants felt that early palliative care could facilitate communication in terms of patient/family preferences in an empathetic and supportive manner and aid in decision-making for end-of-life planning. Early integration ensures the preservation of hope and acts to guide patients and their families to realistically tackle the life-limiting illness.[28]

Almost all the participants felt comfortable referring their patients to palliative care, and this was a heartening response. They perceived this referral as positive and neither had any apprehensions of losing autonomy over their patients nor feared stealing hope from their patients. These results were contrary to the findings of a study that looked at referral patterns to palliative care by Australian oncologists.[29] In that study, oncologists did not feel it necessary to give a palliative care referral as they were confident in treating their patients’ symptoms and perceived their care as non-inferior to a specialist palliative care service. In the study, oncologists had apprehensions about referring their patients due to a poor relationship with the service and perceived poor quality of service.[29] A physician will perceive a benefit in collaborating with the palliative care team if they expect or have experienced a positive interchange and if the benefits of this interchange outweigh the cost of the activity. The future collaborative behaviour will be enhanced by the value of this relationship.[30-32] Our physician participants’ harmonious relationship with the specialist palliative care team and confidence in their care provision appeared to be the reasons for their perception, and these augered well for the future of respiratory palliative care in the country.

Some physicians in our study felt that they were constrained in their referrals due to the paucity of palliative care specialists either in their institution or proximity to practice. The nascence of the palliative care field, with most services concentrated in major oncology centres in the country and the focus of training being palliative oncology, can act as significant barriers for accepting referrals for non-malignant palliative care.[8]

Although most respiratory physicians mentioned the importance of opioids in pain management, dyspnoea, and cough, they still expressed the need to enhance their expertise in palliative care. Pain and symptom management were ranked highest among the topics followed by the issues around end-of-life care and communication skills. These were similar to findings from studies that explored the learning needs of general practitioners in primary palliative care.[33,34] Patients feel a sense of comfort and intimacy with respiratory physicians due to the prolonged period of encounters with their physicians.[35] This emphasises the importance of primary palliative care education for respiratory physicians to enhance their skills at providing primary palliative care and also based on standard referral criteria to know when to initiate palliative care and refer to specialists.[15]

Although this study adds to our understanding of clinical practice, there are several limitations to be aware of. Sampling bias was the key limiting factor, as we selected respiratory physicians from the ICS database. We could have missed the respiratory physicians who were not registered with them. The response rate was not clear from the study as we did not have a definite denominator, but the researchers made every effort to reach out to respiratory physicians through Google Forms, SurveyMonkey, and seminars. We sent the emails to the email ids of respiratory physicians and relied on the correctness of the email ids. This also could have contributed to the poor response. The survey was sent around the time of the COVID pandemic, which could have contributed to the poor response from the study participants.[36] Other possible causes for the low response rate could be disincentivisation, discomfort in using online portals for surveys, or non-response from physicians who were not interested in palliative care.[37,38] There may also have been a possible bias in our responses as those physicians who saw the value in intergrating palliative care actually responded to the survey. Future studies could focus on comparing the perceptions and attitudes of respiratory physicians with exposure to palliative care against those having no exposure. Furthermore, future studies could explore the benefits and challenges of early palliative care for non-malignant respiratory diseases in a resource-constrained environment.

CONCLUSION

Although early palliative care is known to benefit patients with advanced respiratory diseases, which most of our respiratory physicians in the study also favoured, referral to palliative care in the country is still limited. Referral to palliative care will only occur if respiratory physicians perceive the referral as beneficial, available and easily accessible. Therefore, expanding specialist palliative care services beyond oncology and enhancing respiratory physicians’ education in palliative care could potentially improve patient access to palliative care.

Declaration of patient consent

Institutional Review Board (IRB) permission obtained for the study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Available from: https://www.who.int/nmh/global_atlas_of_palliative_care.pdf . [Last accessed on 2022 Jan 14]
  2. . The burden of chronic respiratory diseases and their heterogeneity across the states of India: The global burden of disease study 1990-2016. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e1363-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Palliative care in COPDweb survey in Sweden highlights the current situation for a vulnerable group of patients. Ups J Med Sci. 2013;118:181-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Integrating palliative care in severe chronic obstructive lung disease. COPD. 2008;5:207-20.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Palliative care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A review for clinicians. J R Soc Med. 2007;100:225-33.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Epidemiology and clinical impact of major comorbidities in patients with COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014;9:871-88.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Assessing symptom burden and depression in subjects with chronic respiratory insufficiency. 20218258597211049592.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . Two faces of the same coin: A qualitative study of patients' and carers' coexistence with chronic breathlessness associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) BMC Palliat Care. 2020;19:64.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Palliative care for chronic respiratory disease: Integrated care in outpatient settings. Br J Community Nurs. 2020;25:132-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:733-42.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , et al. Cost savings associated with US hospital palliative care consultation programs. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1783.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. . Barriers to access to palliative care. 2017
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . Access and referral to specialist palliative care: Patients' and professionals' experiences. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2004;10:381-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. . Prevalence and attributable health burden of chronic respiratory diseases, 1990-2017: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:585-96.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , et al. Referral criteria to palliative care for patients with respiratory disease: A systematic review. Eur Respir J. 2021;58:2004307.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , et al. An integrated palliative and respiratory care service for patients with advanced disease and refractory breathlessness: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2:979-87.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. Earlier palliative home care is associated with patient-centred medical resource utilisation and lower costs in the last 30 days before death in COPD: A population-level decedent cohort study. Eur Respir J. 2020;55:1901139.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , et al. A Formative evaluation of patient and family caregiver perspectives on early palliative care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease across disease severity. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16:1024-33.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , et al. Can early introduction of palliative care limit intensive care, emergency, and hospital admissions in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A pilot randomized study. Respiration. 2019;97:406-15.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , . Perceptions and utilization of palliative care services in acute care hospitals. J Palliat Med. 2007;10:99-110.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , . Physician factors associated with outpatient palliative care referral. Palliat Med. 2009;23:608-15.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , . A comparison of the palliative care needs of patients dying from chronic respiratory diseases and lung cancer. Palliat Med. 2001;15:287-95.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , . How well do we care for patients with end stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)? A comparison of palliative care and quality of life in COPD and lung cancer. Thorax. 2000;55:1000-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , . Palliation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Palliat Med. 2014;3:276-85.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , . Provision of palliative care in patients with COPD: A survey among pulmonologists and general practitioners. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021;16:783-94.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , . Communication about palliative care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Palliat Care. 2005;2:157-64.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , . A patient-centred interdisciplinary palliative care programme for end-stage chronic respiratory diseases. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2010;16:189-94.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , . The potential of palliative care for patients with respiratory diseases. Breathe (Sheff). 2017;13:278-89.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , . Cancer specialists' palliative care referral practices and perceptions: Results of a national survey. Palliat Med. 2008;22:51-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. . Social-psychological approaches to understanding addictive behaviours: Attitude-behaviour and decision-making models. Br J Addict. 1987;82:355-70.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. . Determinants of physician referral rates: An exchange theory approach. Med Care. 1974;12:13-31.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , , , et al. Comparative analysis of the attitudes toward palliative care between medical oncologists and pulmonologists. Intern Med. 2021;60:2879-85.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , . Educational needs of general practitioners in palliative care: Outcome of a focus group study. J Cancer Educ. 2005;20:28-33.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. , . General practitioners' attitudes to palliative care: A Western Australian rural perspective. J Palliat Med. 2006;9:1271-81.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , . The preferences of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are to discuss palliative care plans with familiar respiratory clinicians, but to delay conversations until their condition deteriorates: A study guided by interpretative phenomenological analysis. Palliat Med. 2020;34:1361-73.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , , , et al. Cross-sectional survey on physician burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic in Vancouver, Canada: The role of gender, ethnicity and sexual orientation. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e050380.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , . In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:103-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , , , . Planning training seminars in palliative care: A cross-sectional survey on the preferences of general practitioners and nurses in Austria. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:43.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections