Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Conference Abstract
Conference Editorial
Conference Proceedings
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
General Medicine, Case Report
IAPCONKochi 2019 Conference Proceedings
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Narrative Review
Original Article
Palliative Medicine, Letter to the Editor
Personal Reflection
Perspective
Perspectives
Position Paper
Position Statement
Practitioner Section
Report
REPUBLICATION: Special Article (Guidelines)
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Report
Special Editorial
Special Review
Systematic Review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Personal Reflection
20 (
1
); 65-65
doi:
10.4103/0973-1075.125574

Distress Screening Using Distress Thermometer

Primary Care Unit, KMT Center, Bangkok, Thailand
Visiting Professor, Hainan Medical University, Hainan, China
Address for correspondence: Dr. Sora Yasri; E-mail: sorayasri@outlook.co.th
Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher; therefore Scientific Scholar has no control over the quality or content of this article.

Sir,

The report on distress screening using distress thermometer is very interesting.[1] Lewis et al.,[1] concluded for “Positive correlation between distress score and pain score and occurrence of physical symptoms.” The concern is on distress thermometer. Chambers et al.,[2] reported that this tool was acceptable in case that “a cut-off of ≥4 may be optimal soon after diagnosis, and for longer-term assessments, ≥3 was supported.” The adjustment of the tool for each setting is needed. Martínez et al.,[3] noted that “the diagnostic accuracy of the DT could be improved with minor proposed modifications to the DT and the inclusion of nonemotional ultra short measures.” Second, the tool has to be modified in case that it was aiming at pediatric patients screening.[4]

REFERENCES

  1. , , , , . Distress screening using distress thermometer in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy and evaluation of causal factors predicting occurrence of distress. Indian J Palliat Care. 2013;19:88-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . The validity of the distress thermometer in prostate cancer populations. 2013
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . The Distress Thermometer in Spanish cancer patients: Convergent validity and diagnostic accuracy. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21:3095-102.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Development and validation of the distress thermometer for parents of a chronically ill child. J Pediatr. 2013;163:1140-6.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    234

    PDF downloads
    18
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections