Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Conference Abstract
Conference Editorial
Conference Proceedings
Current Issue
Editorial Commentary
General Medicine, Case Report
IAPCONKochi 2019 Conference Proceedings
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Narrative Review
Original Article
Palliative Medicine, Letter to the Editor
Personal Reflection
Position Paper
Position Statement
Practitioner Section
REPUBLICATION: Special Article (Guidelines)
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Report
Special Editorial
Special Review
Systematic Review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Letters to Editor
21 (
); 254-255

Nicotine Replacement Therapy for the Palliation of Nicotine Abstinence Syndrome: Boon More than Bane

Department of Psychiatry, National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Department of Psychiatry, Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Address for correspondence: Dr. Roshan Bhad, E-mail:

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher; therefore Scientific Scholar has no control over the quality or content of this article.


Apropos, the article titled “Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) for Palliation of Nicotine Abstinence Syndrome—Is it Worth?” in Indian Journal of Palliative Care (May − August issue)[1] questioning the worth of NRT for the management of nicotine abstinence (withdrawal) syndrome, we would like to express a difference of opinion. Nicotine use is one of the major public health disasters of the 21st century which is still widely prevalent.[2] The burden of nicotine dependence can be judged from the fact that tobacco in smokeless or smoking form kills 5 million citizens globally every year. The World Health Organization (WHO) projects that the number of deaths will double within the next 15 years worldwide. Tobacco will subsequently be the leading cause of death in the developing world, as it already is in developed countries today.[3] In India too, the situation is not any better as tobacco use is associated with a substantial risk of cancers and by 2020 it is predicted that it will account for 13% of all deaths.[4] It is interesting to note that though tobacco-attributable mortality increases slowly after the initiation of smoking, the effects of cessation emerge more rapidly. Cessation is the only practicable way to avoid a substantial proportion of tobacco-attributable deaths in the world.[5] Unfortunately, there are only limited strategies available to fight this public health menace of global importance. NRT is one of the most commonly used, safe, effective, and evidence-based strategy for tobacco cessation.[67] All the commercially available forms of NRT (gum, transdermal patch, nasal spray, inhaler, and sublingual tablets/lozenges) help people who make a quit attempt increase their chances of successfully stopping smoking. NRT significantly reduces nicotine withdrawal, and hence helps in palliation of nicotine abstinence syndrome. NRTs increase the rate of quitting by 50–70%, regardless of setting.[89] Large amount of misinformation exists regarding relative safety and harm of NRT. It is true that most common side effects associated with NRTs in clinical practice are:

  • Skin irritation when using patches

  • Irritation of nose, throat, or eyes when using a nasal spray

  • Throat irritation, sore mouth, stomach discomfort, hiccups, jaw muscle ache, increased salivation, dizziness, and headaches when using nicotine chewing gums.

However, even after we assumed some harm from long-term NRT use, the benefits from cessation far outweigh the risks.[10] More effort should be made to increase awareness of the full spectrum of harm from tobacco use viz-à-viz potential risks from NRT use and attempts should instead be made to increase the use of this effective intervention for management of tobacco cessation.

Additionally in terms of cost effectiveness, smoking cessation has been termed ‘gold standard’ of healthcare cost effectiveness, producing additional years of life at costs that are well below those estimated for a wide range of healthcare interventions. Provision of NRT with an effectiveness of 1% is predicted to result in the avoidance of about 3.5 million smoking-attributable deaths. Of these, low- and middle-income countries would account for roughly 80% of the averted deaths.[1112] In the developing country like India where about 1 million deaths are expected in male smokers by 2025, NRT should be made easily accessible and subsidized with government run health services supporting the cost of cessation. The already existing National Tobacco Control Programme should be strengthened to support the incorporation of tobacco control efforts into the existing healthcare system.[1314]

Finally, all stakeholders, healthcare specialists including oncologists, palliative care specialists, and psychiatrists having witnessed the agony of patients and their caregivers, should attempt to promote the ancient principle: “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.”


  1. , . Nicotine replacement therapy for palliation of nicotine abstinence syndrome-Is it worth? Indian J Palliat Care. 2014;20:166.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Oxford Textbook of Public Health. Vol 1. (5th ed). Northamptonshire: Oxford University Press; .
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . The global tobacco disease pandemic: Nature, causes, and cures. Global Public Health. 2006;1:65-86.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Tobacco control in India: Present scenario and challenges ahead. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008;9:805-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Global effects of smoking, of quitting, and of taxing tobacco. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:60-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . A comparative study on tobacco cessation methods: A quantitative systematic review. Int J Prev Med. 2014;5:673-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Optimising nicotine replacement therapy in clinical practice. Aust Fam Physician. 2013;42:305-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD000146.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Coping with urges to smoke: What is a clinician to do? Conn Med. 2013;77:289-94.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , . Estimating the risks and benefits of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:341-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Cost effectiveness of smoking-cessation therapies. Interpretation of the evidence-and implications for coverage. PharmacoEconomics. 1997;11:538-49.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . Tobacco Addiction. In: , , , , , , eds. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries (2nd ed). Washington: World Bank; .
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . Smoking and mortality from tuberculosis and other diseases in India: Retrospective study of 43000 adult male deaths and 35000 controls. Lancet. 2003;362:507-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , . Quitting smoking: Challenges and the way forward in the Indian scenario. Curr Sci. 2013;104:1006-7.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views

    PDF downloads
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    Show Sections