Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Conference Abstract
Conference Editorial
Conference Proceedings
Current Issue
Editorial Commentary
General Medicine, Case Report
IAPCONKochi 2019 Conference Proceedings
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Narrative Review
Original Article
Palliative Medicine, Letter to the Editor
Personal Reflection
Position Paper
Position Statement
Practitioner Section
REPUBLICATION: Special Article (Guidelines)
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Report
Special Editorial
Special Review
Systematic Review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
27 (
); 291-298

Quality of Life of Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Psychosocial Perspective using Mixed Method Approach

Department of Social Work, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
Corresponding author: Tushti Bhardwaj, Department of Social Work, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Bhardwaj T. Quality of life of head and neck cancer patients: psychosocial perspective using mixed method approach. Indian J Palliat Care 2021;27(2):291-8.



Head and neck cancers are one of the most visible cancers permanently damaging appearances and affecting some of the very basic life functions of the patients. With advances in medical care and multidisciplinary team interventions, such changes can be managed and patient’s quality of life (QOL) be improved. Thus, it is important to understand the QOL concerns of the patients. The objective of the study was to examine QOL concerns of the patients with head and neck cancer.

Materials and Methods:

A sample of 100 adult cancer patients was selected from NCT of Delhi using non-probability sampling design. Data were collected through European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaires 30 (EORTC QLQ30) and EORTC QLQ Head and Neck specific 35 inventories which was supplemented with qualitative data obtained through semi-structured interviews. Interdependence of the variables and their impact on QOL of patients was studied using co-relational analyses.


Patients with head and neck cancer experienced major changes in their speech, appearances, eating pattern, daily routine, and work efficiency. Emotional functioning of the patients was poorest, followed by social functioning, role functioning, physical functioning, and cognitive functioning. Education had significant positive correlation with global QOL (0.382**, P < 0.01).


QOL of head and neck cancer patients was poor. Emotional functioning of the patients was worst affected as patients had high emotional concerns. The study recommends psycho-educational intervention programs to help patients cope up better with the disease and improve their QOL. Patients’ support group and peer counseling would give emotional strength to the patients as few patients derived positive experience out of the disease episode.


European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires
Head and neck cancer
Quality of life


In the present era, cancer is one of the main health problems in India constituting 9% of the total mortality due to non-communicable diseases.[1] India reports around 4 lakh deaths per year due to cancer. In our country, around 40% of the cancer cases are tobacco related which can be easily prevented[2] by bringing change in attitude and life style of the people. Head and neck (H and N) cancers are more frequently tobacco related cancers and 10th most common cancer in the world.[3] H and N cancer refers to a variety of malignant tumors that develop in the oral cavity (mouth), pharynx (throat), paranasal sinuses (small hollow spaces around nose lined with cells that secrete mucus), nasal cavity (airway just behind the nose), larynx (voice box), and salivary glands (parotid, submanidular, and sublingual glands that secrete saliva).[4] H and N cancer may have devastating effects on the life as patients experience disfigurement and dysfunction. Patients have to face uncertainties of their recovery and fear of recurrence in addition to numerous physical, emotional, social, and financial concerns. These severe changes affect emotional well-being and most basic functions of life such as speech, eating, drinking, social appearances, and lifestyle of the patients affecting their quality of life (QOL).

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines QOL as “an individual’s perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards, and concerns.”[5] QOL includes a broad range of aspects covering physical health, level of independence, emotional state, personal beliefs, social relationships, interaction of family, and cultural environment in which a person lives.[6] Thus, QOL has reference to a subjective construct which denotes how a patient perceives his state of health and well-being. QOL in this research was operationalized as a general sense of well-being, encompassing multidimensional perspective including physical, psychological, social, financial, and spiritual well-being. QOL issues are central of the palliative care specialty as its goals are not just curing the disease but to address a range of physical, emotional, social, and spiritual concerns of the patients and their family. Existing evidence also supports that patients’ QOL can be improved with palliative care interventions.[7] Thus, the present research undertakes psychosocial perspective to study the QOL concerns of the patients with H and N cancers in Indian settings.

Ethical approval

The study was part of the doctoral program and approval granted by Department Research Committee of the Department of Social Work, University of Delhi. Data were collected from Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center (RGCI and RC), New Delhi.


The study was conducted with H and N Cancer patients in the NCT of Delhi with main aim to examine their QOL. The adult patients above 18 years of age being on active treatment for at least 6 weeks were chosen for this study. This time frame was purposively selected so as to allow patients to experience changes in their life if any. A sample of 100 patients was recruited in the study using non-probability sampling methods. Data collection phase ran for a month and all eligible patients visiting surgical outpatient department (OPD) of the hospital were invited to participate. The surgical OPD for data collection was chosen as most of the H and N cancer patients were seen in this OPD. On any given day, an average of 75 patients was registered in the selected OPD making a universe of 900 patients for this study in the selected month. Thus, the study targeted for a minimum of 10% sample of the universe, that is, 90 patients as the acceptable size. During the given timeframe, the study successfully recruited 100 patients using convenient sampling technique. Patients with terminal disease were excluded because their physical and emotional health would not have allowed them to discuss about their experience at length.

A mixed methods approach to data collection was used to study QOL of the patients. Quantitative data were collected using Hindi version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) generic and H and N specific. The core questionnaire (EORTCQLQC30) has 30 items which applies to all patients with cancer while the disease specific questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H and N35) is designed for the patients with cancer of H and N region.[8,9] These instruments assess the symptoms status as well as the functional status i.e. nature of the physical problems experienced by the patients. EORTC QLQC-30 contains five functional scales which are physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning.[8-10] A high score for functional scale represents high or healthy level of functioning.[11] The scale contains three symptom scale and six single items too. A high score for a symptom scale or item represents a high level of symptoms. EORTC QLQ-C30 has two questions to assess global QOL of patients which were related to self-evaluation of patient’s health and QOL on a seven point Likert scale.[9] The high score for global QOL scale represents high QOL.[10,11] The internal reliability coefficients (Cronbach alpha) of EORTC QLQ-C30 for functional scales (except cognitive functioning) and global QLQ ranged from 0.8025 to 0.9431 and symptoms scales between 0.5553 and 0.8296.[10] The reliability coefficient for cognitive functioning was relatively low (0.6341)[10] and even lower in the older version of the scale (version 2).[12] The EORTC QLQ H and N-35 comprises 35 questions incorporating 7 multi-item scales and 11 single items.[8,9] The reliability coefficient for QLQ-H and N35 ranged between 0.7013 and 0.9198.[10] Raw scores obtained from EORTC questionnaires were converted to scores ranging from 0 to 100 using linear transformation according to scoring procedures.[11] Transformed raw scores are here presented and analyzed with respect to sub-scales and individual items. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 16 version and co-relational analyses were used to study the interdependence of variables and their impact on QOL of patients. Quantitative data were supplemented with qualitative data obtained through semi-structured interviews whereby patients were given opportunity to describe nature of their concerns. Patients’ narratives were integrated with qualitative findings to strengthen rigor and trustworthiness. The demographic and medical data were collected using self-developed interview schedule and medical record files of the participants.


A total of 100 patients were enrolled. Results from the quantitative instruments are followed by qualitative data. Table 1 presents characteristics of the study participants. Patients in this study were between 18 and 75 years of age, mean age being 51.31 (SD ± 11.74) years. Majority of the patients (35%) were between 54 and 66 years of age followed by 42– 54 years of age (32%). The two age groups together confirmed that 67% of the patients were between 42 and 66 years of age. H and N cancers were mainly seen among male (86%), female contributed only 12% of the total sample. A very large majority (90%) of respondents were married, only 5% each were either unmarried or widow/widower. Disease contributed to delayed marriage in case of two male respondents as families were in a dilemmatic situation of disclosing about the disease to girl’s family. One third of the sample (33%) was graduate followed by those educated below secondary level (28%). Keeping secondary level education as demarcation line, 58% were educated above secondary level. Distribution of respondents at both extreme of education was quite low, that is, only two respondents were illiterate and another five were postgraduate. Fourteen respondents had technical education in varied fields which included - engineering, law, education (B.Ed.), medicine, specialized course in agriculture, radiology, pharmacy, and speech therapy. One of them had obtained a doctorate degree. Diagnosis of the patients was represented under seven major categories as recorded in their medical file. Cancer of oral cavity was seen among majority of the population (73%), followed by larynx (11%), oropharynx (5%) hypopharynx (4%), and cancer of salivary gland (3%). Cancer of the nasal cavity and nasopharyngeal cancer was rarely seen. Female mainly had cancer of oral cavity. In majority of cases (37%) diagnosis was made at advanced stage, that is, IVa, followed by Stage III (24%). Diagnosis at initial stages, that is, I and II were very rare. For 13 patients, stage determination was not possible as either they were already operated somewhere else or cancer was of unknown origin. A very big majority of patients (62%) in this sample were undergoing curative treatment, while 38% already completed their treatment and were in follow-up phase.

Table 1:: Patients’ characteristics
Patient’s characteristics Percentage of respondents
Age (in years)
18–30 4
30–42 19
42–54 32
54–66 35
66–78 10
Male 88
Female 12
Marital status
Married 90
Unmarried 5
Widow/Widower 5
Illiterate 2
Below Primary 12
Primary but below Secondary 28
Secondary to Sr. Secondary 20
Graduate 33
Postgraduation and above 5
Cancer category
Oral cavity 73
Larynx 11
Oropharynx 5
Hypopharynx 4
Salivary glands 3
Nasopharyngeal 1
Nasal cavity 1
Unknown origin 2
Diagnostic stage
Stage I 9
Stage II 12
Stage III 24
Stage IVa 37
Stage IVb 5
NA 13
Treatment status
Ongoing curative 62
Follow-up 38
Total 100

Table 2 represents QOL scores of the patients on EORTC QLQ30 instrument. Among five subscales, emotional functioning had lowest score (50.45 ± 35.83) followed by social functioning. The share of respondents obtaining below average score was high for emotional (49%) and social functioning (52%), suggesting poor emotional and social functioning among these patients. The scores for physical, role, and cognitive functioning were quite high, maximum being for cognitive functioning (82.04 ± 22.62). The most common concerns experienced by H and N cancer patients were fatigue (56.66 ± 33.59) and financial difficulties (60.81 ± 40.65). Table 2 further shows that 44% had above average score for fatigue while 59% had above average score for financial difficulties. Pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, and constipation were relatively less common concerns but yet disturbing. Only a small percentage had above average score for nausea/vomiting (13%) and diarrhea (3%) suggesting that these were least bothering concerns. Mean score of global QOL was 43.77 (SD ± 31.98), with 48% reporting their health status and QOL as below average.

Table 2:: Descriptive statistics of the EORTC QLQ C-30.
QLQ domains Mean score (SD) Percentage of patients
Below average Above average
Functional scale
Physical functioning 71.50 (29.93) 36 64
Role functioning 61.32 (40.19) 42 58
Emotional functioning 50.45(35.83) 49 51
Cognitive functioning 82.04(22.62) 28 72
Social functioning 51.41(37.48) 52 48
Symptoms scale/item
Fatigue 56.66 (33.59) 56 44
Nausea and vomiting 8.16 (21.24) 87 13
Pain 31.98(34.62) 54 46
Dyspnea 18.99 (32.90) 69 31
Insomnia 28.82 (38.39) 58 42
Appetite loss 33.32 (36.69) 45 55
Constipation 21.65 (34.60) 67 33
Diarrhea 1.99 (12.39) 97 3
Financial difficulties 60.81 (40.65) 41 59
Global QOL 43.77 (31.98) 48 52

EORTC QLQC: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires Core, QOL: Quality of life

Data from H and N cancer specific scale in Table 3 show that dryness of mouth, difficulty in swallowing food, trouble with social eating, maintaining social contact, sticky saliva, feeling ill, use of feeding tube, and weight gain were common H and N cancer concerns as mean scores for these concerns were quite high [Table 3]. Further a high percentage of patients for each of these concerns had above average score.

Table 3:: Descriptive statistics of EORTC QLQ HN 35.
Symptom scale/item Score mean (SD) Percentage of patients
Below average Above average
Pain 28.6 (29.2) 63 37
Swallowing 52.9 (35.0) 57 43
Senses problems 18.65 (27.34) 70 30
Speech problems 45.63 (34.14) 50 50
Trouble with social eating 56.26 (32.56) 47 53
Trouble with social contact 53.99 (34.80) 51 49
Less sexuality 27.90 (35.17) 64 36
Teeth 45.98 (40.41) 55 45
Opening mouth 55.65 (42.12) 47 53
Dry mouth 63.98 (41.49) 39 61
Sticky saliva 49.99 (46.29) 49 51
Coughing 31.23 (40.70) 56 44
Felt ill 65.98 (39.06) 35 65
Pain killers 44.00 (49.88) 56 44
Nutritional supplements 40.00 (49.23) 60 40
Feeding tube 75.00 (43.51) 25 75
Weight loss 35.00 (47.93) 65 35
Weight gain 85.00 (35.88) 15 85

EORTC QLQ HN: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires Head and neck

The correlation analysis of various subscales (functional and symptoms) with global QOL was found to be significant except two symptoms scales namely constipation and diarrhea [Table 4]. Further, all functional subscales showed moderate positive correlation with global QOL expressing that higher the functioning level of patients better is their QOL. The symptom subscales were found to be negatively correlated with global QOL showing lesser the symptoms better is the global QOL. Among the symptoms scales correlation of fatigue (0.505) and financial difficulties (0.452) were highest suggesting that these were most disturbing to the QOL of the patients.

Table 4:: Correlation of global QOL with various subscales.
QOL subscales Correlation with global QOL (r)
Physical functioning 0.423**
Role functioning 0.582**
Emotional functioning 0.524**
Cognitive functioning 0.328**
Social functioning 0.458**
Fatigue –0.505**
Nausea and vomiting –0.302**
Pain –0.342**
Dyspnea –0.274**
Insomnia –0.356**
Appetite loss –0.232**
Constipation –0.073
Diarrhea 0.138
Financial difficulties –0.452**
P<0.01, QOL: Quality of life

Table 5 presents correlation of QOL of the patients with demographic variables namely age, gender, and education. Age and gender were not significantly correlated with any of the functional or symptoms scale except dyspnea which had weak correlation only with age (0.248*). However, the overall QOL of respondents was not related with their age and gender. Education had significant positive correlation with physical functioning (0.203*), emotional functioning (0.252*), and global QOL (0.382**), but negatively correlated with all symptoms scales except constipation, diarrhea, and dyspnea.

Table 5:: Demographic variables and QOL.
QOL scale Age (r) Gender (r) Education (r)
Global QOL –0.058 –0.154 0.382**
Physical functioning –0.097 –0.150 0.203*
Role functioning –0.053 –0.015 0.160
Emotional functioning –0.082 –0.091 0.252*
Cognitive functioning –0.030 0.021 –0.063
Social functioning 0.028 –0.083 0.106
Fatigue 0.128 0.059 –0.327**
Nausea and vomiting –0.021 0.003 –0.220*
Pain –0.121 0.074 –0.218*
Dyspnea 0.248* –0.026 –0.173
Insomnia 0.024 0.003 –0.250*
Appetite loss 0.052 0.000 –0.243*
Constipation 0.178 –0.054 –0.058
Diarrhea 0.024 0.060 0.110
Financial difficulties –0.075 –0.023 –0.241*
P<0.01, *P<0.05, QOL: Quality of life

Results from qualitative interviewing

In qualitative interviews patients with pain symptoms shared their problems of joint pain, chest pain, pain in shoulder, teeth, throat, stomach, and at the operation site. Patients with dyspnea believed that they might be experiencing it because of tracheotomy, cold sensation, and blockage of nose during sleep. Problem of insomnia was attributed to pain and frequent urination at night. Few patients were required to take sleeping pills while one patient shared dependency on alcohol to induce sleep. Patients shared that their physical functioning is so disturbed that they required help for clothing, bathing, using toilet and eating. Few patients could not eat solid or semi-solid food; they were either taking liquid diet or through feeding tube making them dependent on family members. Few respondents shared that they lost taste to specific foods like ginger while others could not feel taste of sugar. Citric and sour food was difficult to eat for few others. For many patients, solid food was difficult to swallow so they required liquid food along with it to ease out chewing process. Chewing was so difficult that few patients needed short breaks while chewing food. They avoided taking lunch at workplace due to disfigurement or problem of food rolling out from the mouth which looked quite unsocial.

One of the patient said, “My eating pattern is changed, I am hesitant to eat food in social gathering and prefer to take lunch all alone. I am mainly dependent only on liquid diet”.

Another patient said, “I am totally dependent on others “food has to be taken through feeding tube requiring presence of someone around”.

Few patients were totally on bed rest while others needed frequent rest. The most frequent problem encountering patient’s role functioning were long off from work. One of the patient said, “I get tired soon and dependent on others for activities of daily living, my work efficiency went down, and I had to take long leave from work.”

Patients shared that they were limited in pursuing hobbies, television watching and believed that no other interest was left in life. Patients experienced lack of concentration especially while watching television and reading newspapers suggesting disruption in their cognitive functioning. In terms of emotional functioning, patients were tensed about family responsibilities, facial disfigurement, finances and loss of work. They experienced irritability, loneliness, and continued brooding about their fate. Patients experienced disturbances in their social relationships. They lost interest in interacting with people and avoided social gathering. Their social circle was curtailed, interpersonal relations strained and family life disturbed as in few cases, patients were away from home for treatment. They had to cover up neck and face while going in public places as people’ repeated interrogation about the disease, tracheotomy, and facial disfigurement made them irritated.

One of the patient said, “I am concerned about facial disfigurement, my looks are unacceptable, I have to cover up my face”.

Another patient shared, “I am hesitant for social interaction because of disfigurement and distorted speech, I feel irritated when friends and relative ask about the episode time and again.”

Another patient shared, “I became short tempered, worried, anxious, low in confidence, and almost lost will to live.”

Patients either lost their voice completely or left with distorted speech, which interrupted their social interaction and made them hesitant to go in public. Few had difficulty only with telephonic conversation. In other cases pronunciation impaired, public speaking confidence declined and voice pitch became so low that other people were not able to understand what was being said. Dryness of mouth also made verbal communication difficult. A lawyer described his experience as “distorted speech made me handicap, I can’t argue in the court the way I used to do before. Earlier people used to come to hear the court proceedings, now even the judge asks me to repeat time and again.”

During the treatment process patient’s sexual interest and intimacy with partner declined. For few others, their sexual life disturbed as they were out of home for treatment for many months. In few cases patients lost will to enjoy life and live happily. While on the other hand, few patients experienced positive changes in their life like being more religious, and resilient. They leant to control their temper and became more tolerant, calm composed, and lowered their expectations from life. They discovered their own self and a new outlook to life during the disease phase.


This research studied QOL concerns of the H and N cancer patients using triangulation of quantitative and qualitative methods. Patients’ experiential account supplemented the quantitative findings and presented scope to understand their concerns more clearly.

The study sample was highly dominated by male patients. The mean age of the H and N cancer patients in this study (51.3 ± 11.74) is similar to the previous studies[13-15] confirming that H and N cancers are male dominated and mainly seen in middle age.[14] The study reported that diagnosis at initial stages, that is, I and II were very rare, advanced stage diagnosis put together (Stage III, IVa, and IVb) constituted sixty six percent (66%) of total diagnosis. This suggests that H and N cancer are generally not reported at initial time; as a result disease aggravates and reaches to higher stage of diagnosis. Though this research does not have statistical evidence to support disease progression but previous evidences from an epidemiological study of H and N cancer patients reported that treatment delay of 46–52 days may introduce increased risk of death.[16] Thus, there is an urgent need to make people aware of the early identification and reporting of the symptoms to the specialist.

In the present study, stress-appraisal model developed by Lazarus and Folkman[17] was incorporated to identify variables affecting QOL of the patients. This model advocates that demographic variables and illness related characteristics like stage of the disease affects QOL of the patients. In this study, age and gender were not significantly correlated with any of the functional or symptoms scale except dyspnea which correlated with age. This suggests that for H and N cancer patients, the problem of dyspnea also aggravates as their age advances. However, the overall QOL of respondents was not related with their age and gender. The previous researchers have also examined factors affecting QOL of patients and suggested that socio-demographic variables affect QOL and survival in patients with oral cancer.[18] Another research[19] conducted with 50 Chinese patients of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma reported women having significantly lower QOL scores for fatigue, diarrhea and emotional functioning than men. While, QOL in the previous literature[17-20] was found to be related with demographic variables such as age, gender, and disease status but findings of the present study is contrary to the known relationship. One of the reasons for the same may be uneven distribution of the sample on the basis of age, gender, and disease status as it was a male dominated sample and heavy concentration was seen in the middle age (42–66 years). Further, more concentrations of the patients were from advance stages making it difficult to find any significant relationship. Despite all limitations, it was a meaningful sample to study because main aim of this research was to examine QOL of the patients and describe their challenges. Interestingly among all the demographic variables, education was found to have significant positive correlation with global QOL indicating that highly educated patients experience better QOL. Further, education was found to have significant positive correlation with physical and emotional functioning and significant negative correlation with all symptoms scale. Similar findings have been reported by a previous research which suggested that highly educated patients experienced better cognitive functioning and less pain.[12] This indicates that highly educated patients experience better physical and emotional functioning and fewer symptoms as compared to less educated patients. This suggests that educated persons can cope up with the symptoms better and minimize discomfort for them. Thus, this study suggests that education contributes to improve QOL suggesting the need of information dissemination and educational interventions in cancer care to improve the QOL outcome of the patients.

The study reported that patients with H and N cancer experienced major changes in their speech, appearances, eating pattern, daily routine, and work efficiency which was also reported in the previous literature.[13,18,19,21-23] Constipation and diarrhea did not relate statistically with global QOL in this research, suggesting that these were least bothering concerns for H and N cancer patients and did not count much towards their QOL. Patients were concerned about uncertainty of life, facial disfigurement, distorted speech, family responsibilities, declining work efficiency, financial arrangements, cumbersome reimbursement policies, and fear of recurrence. This suggests the scope of specialized speech therapy and low cost cosmetic surgery within the oncology set-up so that patients’ concerns are well cared and their QOL may be improved. Further, alternate work opportunities best suited to the changed capacities of the patients need to be incorporated as a matter of policy at all workplaces.

Among five subscales of QOL, emotional functioning had lowest score followed by social functioning. The scores for physical functioning, role functioning, and cognitive functioning were quite high, maximum being for cognitive functioning. This explains that for H and N cancer patients cognitive functioning was least affected while emotional and social functioning were highly affected. The present study found that patients with H and N cancer became more irritated, worried, anxious, short-tempered, low in confidence, and lost will to live happily. QOL for about half of the sample was found to be on the lower end of the scale. Previous research[24] with cancer survivors also reported poor QOL outcomes. The mixed method approach proved very useful in this research as few positive changes experienced by the patients were highlighted by qualitative findings which otherwise could have been missed using only quantitative tools. The study reported that few patients also experienced better changes in their life like becoming more religious, tolerant, calm and controlled temper tantrums, quitting alcohol, smoking, and tobacco. A previous research which studied benefit finding approach with H and N cancer patients also revealed positive consequences of the disease phase.[25] This suggests that patients experiencing positive changes can be motivated to volunteer as peer counselors and support groups to provide emotional strength to other patients and help them deal with the concerns much better.


The research concludes that patients with H and N cancer experienced major changes in their speech, appearances, eating pattern, daily routine, and work efficiency. Patients with H and N cancer had high emotional concerns, but education may improve patients’ physical and emotional functioning. Thus psycho-social professionals must develop information dissemination and psycho-educational interventions to educate patients. The psychosocial professionals need to be placed at the rightful levels and need to take up proactive role in multidisciplinary team to help families successfully deal with the crisis situation and improve their QOL. Patients’ support groups and peer counselors would be valuable resource to give emotional strength to the patients and their families.

Declaration of patient consent

The study involved patients and verbal consent was taken before interview.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


  1. . Non-Communicable Disease: Country Profile 2016. . Geneva: World Health Organization; Available from: [Last accessed on 2021 Apr 02]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. . National Cancer Control Programmes: Policies and Managerial Guidelines Geneva: World Health Organization; .
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Quality of life in patients with head and neck cancers. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006;98:765-70.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. . Head and Neck Cancers USA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. . Available from: [Last accessed on 2021 Apr 02]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. . WHOQOL: Measuring Quality of Life 2021. . Geneva: World Health Organization; Available from: [Last accessed on 2021 Apr 02]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. . WHO User Manual-Programme on Mental Health Division of Mental Health and Prevention of Substance Abuse. . Available from: [Last accessed on 2021 Apr 01]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Cancer: Current Scenario, Intervention Strategies and Projections for 2015 Burden of Disease in India. . p. 219.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference Values Manual.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:365-76.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Quality of life of head and neck cancer patient: Validation of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30 and European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-H and N35 in Indian patients. Indian J Cancer. 2005;42:178.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. .
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , . Assessing quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer: Cross-validation of the european organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC) quality of life head and neck module (QLQ-H and N35) Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:459-67.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , . Quality of life of head and neck cancer patients before and after cancer-directed treatment-a longitudinal study. J Cancer Res Ther. 2020;16:500-7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. Epidemiological review of head and neck cancers in Karachi. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2006;7:195-200.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , . Changes in survival in head and neck cancers in the late 20th and early 21st century: A period analysis. Oncologist. 2010;15:994-1001.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , et al. Survival impact of increasing time to treatment initiation for patients with head and neck cancer in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:169-78.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. , . Stress, Appraisal, and Coping New York: Springer; .
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , . Quality of life after free-flap reconstruction in patients with oral and pharyngeal cancer. Head Neck. 2006;28:210-6.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. , . Quality of life of patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with nasopharyngectomy using the maxillary swing approach. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;132:309-16.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , . The psychosocial impact of cancer on older versus younger patients and their families. Cancer. 1994;74:2118-27.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. . Facial disfigurement and sense of self in head and neck cancer. Soc Work Health Care. 2020;40:73-87.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , . A literature review of head and neck cancer patients information needs, experiences and views regarding decision-making. Eur J Cancer Care. 2004;13:119-26.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , . Body image in patients with head and neck cancer: A review of the literature. Oral Oncol. 2013;49:753-60.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , . Burden of illness in cancer survivors: Findings from a population-based national sample. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1322-30.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , , et al. Assessing the psychological predictors of benefit finding in patients with head and neck cancer. Psychooncology. 2013;22:97-105.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections